Literature DB >> 26279232

Bears Show a Physiological but Limited Behavioral Response to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Mark A Ditmer1, John B Vincent2, Leland K Werden2, Jessie C Tanner3, Timothy G Laske4, Paul A Iaizzo5, David L Garshelis6, John R Fieberg7.   

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have the potential to revolutionize the way research is conducted in many scientific fields. UAVs can access remote or difficult terrain, collect large amounts of data for lower cost than traditional aerial methods, and facilitate observations of species that are wary of human presence. Currently, despite large regulatory hurdles, UAVs are being deployed by researchers and conservationists to monitor threats to biodiversity, collect frequent aerial imagery, estimate population abundance, and deter poaching. Studies have examined the behavioral responses of wildlife to aircraft (including UAVs), but with the widespread increase in UAV flights, it is critical to understand whether UAVs act as stressors to wildlife and to quantify that impact. Biologger technology allows for the remote monitoring of stress responses in free-roaming individuals, and when linked to locational information, it can be used to determine events or components of an animal's environment that elicit a physiological response not apparent based on behavior alone. We assessed effects of UAV flights on movements and heart rate responses of free-roaming American black bears. We observed consistently strong physiological responses but infrequent behavioral changes. All bears, including an individual denned for hibernation, responded to UAV flights with elevated heart rates, rising as much as 123 beats per minute above the pre-flight baseline. It is important to consider the additional stress on wildlife from UAV flights when developing regulations and best scientific practices.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279232     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  31 in total

1.  Four steps to extend drone use in research.

Authors:  Nicholas C Coops; Tristan R H Goodbody; Lin Cao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Biology goes in the air: Unmanned aerial vehicles offer biologists an efficient tool for observation and sampling from a safe distance.

Authors:  Howard Wolinsky
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Challenges and solutions for studying collective animal behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Lacey F Hughey; Andrew M Hein; Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin; Frants H Jensen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A global horizon scan of the future impacts of robotics and autonomous systems on urban ecosystems.

Authors:  Mark A Goddard; Zoe G Davies; Solène Guenat; Mark J Ferguson; Jessica C Fisher; Adeniran Akanni; Teija Ahjokoski; Pippin M L Anderson; Fabio Angeoletto; Constantinos Antoniou; Adam J Bates; Andrew Barkwith; Adam Berland; Christopher J Bouch; Christine C Rega-Brodsky; Loren B Byrne; David Cameron; Rory Canavan; Tim Chapman; Stuart Connop; Steve Crossland; Marie C Dade; David A Dawson; Cynnamon Dobbs; Colleen T Downs; Erle C Ellis; Francisco J Escobedo; Paul Gobster; Natalie Marie Gulsrud; Burak Guneralp; Amy K Hahs; James D Hale; Christopher Hassall; Marcus Hedblom; Dieter F Hochuli; Tommi Inkinen; Ioan-Cristian Ioja; Dave Kendal; Tom Knowland; Ingo Kowarik; Simon J Langdale; Susannah B Lerman; Ian MacGregor-Fors; Peter Manning; Peter Massini; Stacey McLean; David D Mkwambisi; Alessandro Ossola; Gabriel Pérez Luque; Luis Pérez-Urrestarazu; Katia Perini; Gad Perry; Tristan J Pett; Kate E Plummer; Raoufou A Radji; Uri Roll; Simon G Potts; Heather Rumble; Jon P Sadler; Stevienna de Saille; Sebastian Sautter; Catherine E Scott; Assaf Shwartz; Tracy Smith; Robbert P H Snep; Carl D Soulsbury; Margaret C Stanley; Tim Van de Voorde; Stephen J Venn; Philip H Warren; Carla-Leanne Washbourne; Mark Whitling; Nicholas S G Williams; Jun Yang; Kumelachew Yeshitela; Ken P Yocom; Martin Dallimer
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Robust Algorithms for Drone-Assisted Monitoring of Big Animals in Harsh Conditions of Siberian Winter Forests: Recovery of European elk (Alces alces) in Salair Mountains.

Authors:  Alexander Prosekov; Anna Vesnina; Victor Atuchin; Aleksandr Kuznetsov
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 6.  Heart rate as a measure of emotional arousal in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  Future trends in measuring physiology in free-living animals.

Authors:  H J Williams; J Ryan Shipley; C Rutz; M Wikelski; M Wilkes; L A Hawkes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Fewer bat passes are detected during small, commercial drone flights.

Authors:  Gabrielle Ednie; David M Bird; Kyle H Elliott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Inside out: heart rate monitoring to advance the welfare and conservation of maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus).

Authors:  Rosana N Moraes; Timothy G Laske; Peter Leimgruber; Jared A Stabach; Paul E Marinari; Megan M Horning; Noelle R Laske; Juan V Rodriguez; Ginger N Eye; Jessica E Kordell; Marissa Gonzalez; Tom Eyring; Christopher Lemons; Kelly E Helmick; Kristina M Delaski; Lisa H Ware; Julia C Jones; Nucharin Songsasen
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Digital technology and the conservation of nature.

Authors:  Koen Arts; René van der Wal; William M Adams
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.