Literature DB >> 26279209

Observing accidental and intentional unusual actions is associated with different subregions of the medial frontal cortex.

Charlotte Desmet1, Marcel Brass2.   

Abstract

The literature on action observation revealed contradictory results regarding the activation of different subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex when observing unusual behaviour. Error observation research has shown that the posterior part of the medial prefrontal cortex is more active when observing unusual behaviour compared to usual behaviour while action understanding research has revealed some mixed results concerning the role of the anterior part of the medial prefrontal cortex during the observation of unusual actions. Here, we resolve this discrepancy in the literature by showing that different parts of the medial prefrontal cortex are active depending on whether an observed unusual behaviour is intentional or not. While the posterior medial prefrontal cortex is more active when we observe unusual accidental actions compared to unusual intentional actions, a more anterior part of the medial prefrontal cortex is more active when we observe unusual intentional actions compared to unusual accidental actions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Accidental action; Error observation; Intentional action; Medial prefrontal cortex; Mentalizing; Theory of mind

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279209     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  The Graded Change in Connectivity across the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Reveals Distinct Subregions.

Authors:  Rebecca L Jackson; Claude J Bajada; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Lauren L Cloutman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.861

2.  The role of parietal cortex in overimitation: a study with fNIRS.

Authors:  Dominic Oliver; Ilias Tachtsidis; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Moving higher and higher: imitators' movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality.

Authors:  Paul A G Forbes; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Performance Monitoring Applied to System Supervision.

Authors:  Bertille Somon; Aurélie Campagne; Arnaud Delorme; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Brain regions involved in observing and trying to interpret dog behaviour.

Authors:  Charlotte Desmet; Alko van der Wiel; Marcel Brass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Early modulation of intra-cortical inhibition during the observation of action mistakes.

Authors:  Pasquale Cardellicchio; Pauline M Hilt; Etienne Olivier; Luciano Fadiga; Alessandro D'Ausilio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Perceptual teleology: expectations of action efficiency bias social perception.

Authors:  Matthew Hudson; Katrina L McDonough; Rhys Edwards; Patric Bach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sophisticated Deception in Junior Middle School Students: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Haizhou Leng; Yanrong Wang; Qian Li; Lizhu Yang; Yan Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.