Literature DB >> 26278829

Historical note: How bringing women's health advocacy groups to WHO helped change the research agenda.

Jane Cottingham1.   

Abstract

The politics of population control and its sometimes coercive methods in developing countries documented during the 1960s, 70s and 80s, gave rise to strong opposition by women's groups, and put into question the safety of contraceptive methods that were being developed and introduced into countries. In 1991, the Special Programme on Human Reproduction at the World Health Organization, a research programme focused on development of new methods and safety assessments of existing fertility regulation methods, started a process of "dialogue" meetings between scientists and women's health advocacy groups which lasted for nearly a decade. This paper describes the process of these meetings and what they achieved in terms of bringing new or different research topics into the agenda, and some of the actions taken as a result.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research; contraception; efficacy; ethics; fertility regulation; human rights; informed consent; safety; sexual and reproductive health; women's health advocates

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26278829     DOI: 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 0968-8080


  2 in total

1.  A summative content analysis of how programmes to improve the right to sexual and reproductive health address power.

Authors:  Marta Schaaf; Victoria Boydell; Stephanie M Topp; Aditi Iyer; Gita Sen; Ian Askew
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-04

2.  "Righting the wrongs": addressing human rights and gender equality through research since Cairo.

Authors:  Rajat Khosla; Avni Amin; Pascale Allotey; Carmen Barroso; Asha George; Anita Hardon; Ian Askew
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2019-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.