Literature DB >> 26278823

Outcomes of Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy With and Without the Assistance of Doppler Ultrasound: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Liqiang Guo1, Wendong Sun1, Guangfeng Shao1, Hongbin Song2, Nan Ge2, Shengtian Zhao2, Yuqiang Liu2, Xiulin Zhang1, Zhiying Xiao3, Mingzhen Yuan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcomes and complications between microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy (MV) and intraoperative vascular Doppler ultrasound-assisted microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy (IVDU-MV) for infertile patients with varicoceles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-two infertile patients with varicoceles were randomly divided into IVDU-MV group (n = 85) and MV group (n = 87). We assessed patients' operative and postoperative parameters, semen parameters, and the pregnancy rate. The mean follow-up period was 21 months (range, 13-34 months).
RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the IVDU-MV group than MV group (41.9 ± 13.6 vs 52.7 ± 14.1 minutes, P <.05). The number of intraoperative arteries spared was significantly greater in the IVDU-MV group than the MV group (1.9 ± 0.8 vs 1.3 ± 0.7, P <.05). In addition, the average number of spermatic veins ligated was significantly greater in the IVDU-MV group (7.8 ± 2.1 vs 7.0 ± 1.9, P <.05). Lymphatic spared showed no significant difference (P >.05). The postoperative hospital stay showed no significant difference. Sperm concentration, sperm motility, and the percentage of grade a+b sperm were significantly increased in both groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery (P <.05), and the sperm motility was higher in IVDU-MV than MV group (43.98 ± 7.64 vs 36.98 ± 5.10, P <.05) in 12 months after surgery. Sperm morphology was comparable between the 2 groups. The pregnancy rate showed no significant difference (36.8% of the MV vs 34.1% of the IVDU-MV, P >.05).
CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that both MV and IVDU-MV are effective methods for the improvement of semen parameters in infertile men with varicocele, with a natural conception rate of 35% over a mean follow-up of 21 months. Compared with MV, IVDU-MV is superior in shortening operative time, increasing the number of spermatic arteries spared, spermatic veins ligated, and sperm motility after surgery. IVDU should be routinely used as an effective tool to improve outcomes and safety of varicocelectomy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26278823     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

Review 1.  Transitional Urology for Male Adolescents: What Adult Urologists Should Know.

Authors:  Kristina D Suson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Clinical effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with enhanced recovery after surgery for varicocele.

Authors:  Xiaobin Wang; Ruipeng Wang; Qiang Du; Bochen Pan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

Review 3.  Outcome reporting across randomized controlled trials evaluating potential treatments for male infertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael P Rimmer; Ruth A Howie; Venkatesh Subramanian; Richard A Anderson; Ricardo Pimenta Bertolla; Yusuf Beebeejaun; Pietro Bortoletto; Sesh K Sunkara; Rod T Mitchell; Allan Pacey; Madelon van Wely; Cindy M Farquhar; James M N Duffy; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 4.  A review of varicocele repair for pain.

Authors:  Ryan C Owen; Benjamin J McCormick; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-05

5.  The application of laparoscopic Doppler ultrasound during laparoscopic varicocelectomy in infertile men.

Authors:  Li-Qiang Guo; Xiu-Lin Zhang; Yu-Qiang Liu; Wen-Dong Sun; Sheng-Tian Zhao; Ming-Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Use of indocyanine green angiography in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy - lessons learned from our initial experience.

Authors:  Chak-Lam Cho; Kwan-Lun Ho; Wayne Kwun-Wai Chan; Ringo Wing-Hong Chu; In-Chak Law
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 7.  Varicocele and Testicular Pain: A Review.

Authors:  Sunghyun Paick; Woo Suk Choi
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.400

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.