Literature DB >> 26278356

An attempt to estimate ionic interactions with phenyl and pentafluorophenyl stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography.

Caroline West1, Elise Lemasson2, Syame Khater2, Eric Lesellier2.   

Abstract

Pentafluorophenyl-bonded silica (PFP) phases employed in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) often provide very different results depending on the column manufacturer. PFP phases also provide significantly different selectivity from non-fluorinated aromatic phases. As all HPLC columns can also be employed with carbon dioxide-based mobile phases, PFP phases can also be useful to supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC). However, whether they provide adequate retention and selectivity in SFC conditions is necessary for them to find applicability with this technique. In our laboratory, a column classification for packed column SFC was designed, based on the solvation parameter model, which currently comprises data for about eighty different columns. In this paper, we present the characterization of eleven PFP phases provided by different manufacturers used with carbon dioxide-methanol mobile phases. The columns are compared to fifteen other non-fluorinated phenyl and diphenyl phases in terms of their retention and separation characteristics assessed by the solvation parameter model with five Abraham descriptors. The latter is insufficient for an accurate description of retention mechanisms on the PFP phases, thus two extra terms accounting for ionic interactions with anions and cations (D(-) and D(+)), previously developed for HPLC in hydrophilic interaction mode (HILIC), are introduced. While some approximations are necessary regarding the true pH and pKa values in CO2-based mobile phases, the retention models are significantly improved by this addition, allowing to integrate ionizable analytes in the test set for evaluation of ionic interactions in the chromatographic systems.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aromatic stationary phases; Ionic interactions; Method development; Selectivity; Solvation parameter model; Supercritical fluid chromatography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26278356     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  2 in total

1.  Supercritical Fluid Chromatography of Drugs: Parallel Factor Analysis for Column Testing in a Wide Range of Operational Conditions.

Authors:  Ramia Z Al Bakain; Yahya Al-Degs; Bertyl Andri; Didier Thiébaut; Jérôme Vial; Isabelle Rivals
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 2.  Advanced Development of Supercritical Fluid Chromatography in Herbal Medicine Analysis.

Authors:  Min Chen; Shan-Shan Wen; Rui Wang; Qing-Xuan Ren; Chen-Wan Guo; Ping Li; Wen Gao
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.927

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.