Literature DB >> 26278338

Performance of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 Against Different Delirium Diagnostic Criteria in a Population With a High Prevalence of Dementia.

Esteban Sepulveda1, José G Franco2, Paula T Trzepacz3, Ana M Gaviria1, Eva Viñuelas1, José Palma1, Gisela Ferré1, Imma Grau1, Elisabet Vilella1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delirium diagnosis in elderly is often complicated by underlying dementia.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated performance of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) in patients with high dementia prevalence and also assessed concordance among past and current diagnostic criteria for delirium.
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of newly admitted patients to a skilled nursing facility over 6 months, who were rated within 24-48 hours after admission. Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition-R (DSM)-III-R, DSM-IV, DSM-5, and International Classification of Diseases 10th edition delirium ratings, administration of the DRS-R98, and assessment of dementia using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly were independently performed by 3 researchers. Discriminant analyses (receiver operating characteristics curves) were used to study DRS-R98 accuracy against different diagnostic criteria. Hanley and McNeil test compared the area under the curve for DRS-R98's discriminant performance for all diagnostic criteria.
RESULTS: Dementia was present in 85/125 (68.0%) subjects, and 36/125 (28.8%) met criteria for delirium by at least 1 classification system, whereas only 19/36 (52.8%) did by all. DSM-III-R diagnosed the most as delirious (27.2%), followed by DSM-5 (24.8%), DSM-IV-TR (22.4%), and International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (16%). DRS-R98 had the highest AUC when discriminating DSM-III-R delirium (92.9%), followed by DSM-IV (92.4%), DSM-5 (91%), and International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (90.5%), without statistical differences among them. The best DRS-R98 cutoff score was ≥14.5 for all diagnostic systems except International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (≥15.5).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a low concordance across diagnostic systems for identification of delirium. The DRS-R98 performs well despite differences across classification systems perhaps because it broadly assesses phenomenology, even in this population with a high prevalence of dementia.
Copyright © 2015 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26278338     DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2015.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosomatics        ISSN: 0033-3182            Impact factor:   2.386


  7 in total

1.  Effect of Cognitively Stimulating Activities on Symptom Management of Delirium Superimposed on Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ann Kolanowski; Donna Fick; Mark Litaker; Paula Mulhall; Linda Clare; Nikki Hill; Jacqueline Mogle; Malaz Boustani; David Gill; Andrea Yevchak-Sillner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  The complex interaction of genetics and delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Esteban Sepulveda; Dimitrios Adamis; Jose G Franco; David Meagher; Selena Aranda; Elisabet Vilella
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  The relationship between in-hospital location and outcomes of care in patients diagnosed with dementia and/or delirium diagnoses: analysis of patient journey.

Authors:  Lua Perimal-Lewis; Clare Bradley; Paul H Hakendorf; Craig Whitehead; Louise Heuzenroeder; Maria Crotty
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Subsyndromal delirium compared with delirium, dementia, and subjects without delirium or dementia in elderly general hospital admissions and nursing home residents.

Authors:  Esteban Sepulveda; Maeve Leonard; Jose G Franco; Dimitrios Adamis; Geraldine McCarthy; Colum Dunne; Paula T Trzepacz; Ana M Gaviria; Joan de Pablo; Elisabet Vilella; David J Meagher
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2016-12-01

5.  Multicomponent non-pharmacological intervention to prevent delirium for hospitalised people with advanced cancer: study protocol for a phase II cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Annmarie Hosie; Jane Phillips; Lawrence Lam; Slavica Kochovska; Beverly Noble; Meg Brassil; Susan E Kurrle; Anne Cumming; Gideon A Caplan; Richard Chye; Brian Le; E Wesley Ely; Peter G Lawlor; Shirley H Bush; Jan Maree Davis; Melanie Lovell; Linda Brown; Belinda Fazekas; Seong Leang Cheah; Layla Edwards; Meera Agar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Delirium diagnosis defined by cluster analysis of symptoms versus diagnosis by DSM and ICD criteria: diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Esteban Sepulveda; José G Franco; Paula T Trzepacz; Ana M Gaviria; David J Meagher; José Palma; Eva Viñuelas; Imma Grau; Elisabet Vilella; Joan de Pablo
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  The consistent burden in published estimates of delirium occurrence in medical inpatients over four decades: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Kate Gibb; Anna Seeley; Terry Quinn; Najma Siddiqi; Susan Shenkin; Kenneth Rockwood; Daniel Davis
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 10.668

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.