Literature DB >> 26276892

Preclinical Assessment of Efficacy of Radiation Dose Painting Based on Intratumoral FDG-PET Uptake.

Daniela Trani1, Ala Yaromina2, Ludwig Dubois1, Marlies Granzier1, Sarah G J A Peeters1, Rianne Biemans1, Georgi Nalbantov1, Natasja Lieuwes1, Brigitte Reniers3, Esther E G C Troost4, Frank Verhaegen1, Philippe Lambin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We tested therapeutic efficacy of two dose painting strategies of applying higher radiation dose to tumor subvolumes with high FDG uptake (biologic target volume, BTV): dose escalation and dose redistribution. We also investigated whether tumor response was determined by the highest dose in BTV or the lowest dose in gross tumor volume (GTV). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: FDG uptake was evaluated in rat rhabdomyosarcomas prior to irradiation. BTV was defined as 30% of GTV with the highest (BTVhot) or lowest (BTVcold) uptake. To test efficacy of dose escalation, tumor response (time to reach two times starting tumor volume, TGTV2) to Hot Boost irradiation (40% higher dose to BTVhot) was compared with Cold Boost (40% higher dose to BTVcold), while mean dose to GTV remained 12 Gy. To test efficacy of dose redistribution, TGTV2 after Hot Boost was compared with uniform irradiation with the same mean dose (8 or 12 Gy).
RESULTS: TGTV2 after 12 Gy delivered heterogeneously (Hot and Cold Boost) or uniformly were not significantly different: 20.2, 19.5, and 20.6 days, respectively. Dose redistribution (Hot Boost) with 8 Gy resulted in faster tumor regrowth as compared with uniform irradiation (13.3 vs. 17.1 days; P = 0.026). Further increase in dose gradient to 60% led to a more pronounced decrease in TGTV2 (10.9 days; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation effect was independent of FDG uptake in target tumor volume, while dose redistribution was detrimental in this tumor model for dose levels applied here. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that tumor response depends on the minimum intratumoral dose. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276892     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  8 in total

1.  Dose painting by dynamic irradiation delivery on an image-guided small animal radiotherapy platform.

Authors:  Stefan J van Hoof; Joana B Verde; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The use of hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance for molecular imaging.

Authors:  Sarmad Siddiqui; Stephen Kadlecek; Mehrdad Pourfathi; Yi Xin; William Mannherz; Hooman Hamedani; Nicholas Drachman; Kai Ruppert; Justin Clapp; Rahim Rizi
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Preclinical models of radiation-induced lung damage: challenges and opportunities for small animal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mihaela Ghita; Victoria Dunne; Gerard G Hanna; Kevin M Prise; Jaqueline P Williams; Karl T Butterworth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Utilization of a hybrid finite-element based registration method to quantify heterogeneous tumor response for adaptive treatment for lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Hoda Sharifi; Hong Zhang; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Wei Lu; Munther I Ajlouni; Jian-Yue Jin; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Indrin J Chetty; Hualiang Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Integrating Small Animal Irradiators withFunctional Imaging for Advanced Preclinical Radiotherapy Research.

Authors:  Mihaela Ghita; Kathryn H Brown; Olivia J Kelada; Edward E Graves; Karl T Butterworth
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Immunological Planning-A Review With a Proposed Theoretical Model.

Authors:  Kumara Swamy
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Respiration-Averaged CT for Attenuation Correction of PET Images - Impact on PET Texture Features in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nai-Ming Cheng; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Din-Li Tsan; Ching-Han Hsu; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of different biologically-adapted radiotherapy strategies on tumor control evaluated with a tumor response model.

Authors:  Araceli Gago-Arias; Beatriz Sánchez-Nieto; Ignacio Espinoza; Christian P Karger; Juan Pardo-Montero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.