Literature DB >> 26276837

Activity and outcomes for aortic valve implantations performed in England and Wales since the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Stuart W Grant1, Graeme L Hickey2, Peter Ludman3, Neil Moat4, David Cunningham5, Mark de Belder6, Daniel J Blackman7, David Hildick-Smith8, Rakesh Uppal9, Simon Kendall6, Ben Bridgewater10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The first transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in England and Wales was performed in 2007. This study presents the subsequent national activity and outcomes for both TAVI and aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS: Data for all AVR and TAVI procedures between January 2006 and December 2012 in England and Wales were included. The number of procedures, patient characteristics, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, postoperative length of stay (PLOS) and survival were analysed separately for: isolated AVR; AVR + coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery; AVR + other surgery and TAVI.
RESULTS: The number of TAVIs increased from 66 in 2007 (0.8% of all implants) to 1186 in 2012 (10.9% of all implants). AVR activity also increased over the study period. TAVI patients were older and had a higher mean logistic EuroSCORE than all AVR groups. The 30-day mortality rates were 2.1% for isolated AVR, 3.9% for AVR + CABG, 7.7% for AVR + other surgery and 6.2% for TAVI. In-hospital mortality has significantly improved for all groups. The 5-year survival rates were 82.6% for isolated AVR, 81.7% for AVR + CABG, 74.5% for AVR + other surgery and 46.1% for TAVI. The median PLOS after TAVI was similar to that of isolated AVR but shorter than that of the other AVR groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Since the introduction of TAVI, there has been an increase in both TAVI and AVR activity. TAVIs now represent over 10% of all aortic valve implants. There are distinct differences between procedural groups with respect to patient risk factors. Outcomes for all procedural groups have improved, but long-term TAVI results are required before its role in the treatment of aortic stenosis can be fully defined.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve; Outcomes; Survival; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Trends

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276837     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Use of multidetector-row computed tomography scan to detect pannus formation in prosthetic mechanical aortic valves.

Authors:  Mohamed A Aladmawi; Claudio Pragliola; Olga Vriz; Domenico Galzerano
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Indirect Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Activity and Outcomes of Transcatheter and Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis in England.

Authors:  Glen P Martin; Nick Curzen; Andrew T Goodwin; James Nolan; Lognathen Balacumaraswami; Peter F Ludman; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Jianhua Wu; Chris P Gale; Mark A de Belder; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Cardiac surgery in older patients: hospital outcomes during a 15-year period from a complete national series.

Authors:  James Mark Jones; Mahmoud Loubani; Stuart W Grant; Andrew T Goodwin; Uday Trivedi; Simon Kendall; David P Jenkins
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  Trends and outcomes for cardiac surgery in the United Kingdom from 2002 to 2016.

Authors:  Stuart W Grant; Simon Kendall; Andrew T Goodwin; Graham Cooper; Uday Trivedi; Richard Page; David P Jenkins
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 5.  Cardiac CT in prosthetic aortic valve complications.

Authors:  Jack Patrick Morrell Andrews; Timothy Rg Cartlidge; Marc Robert Dweck; Alastair J Moss
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis in different European centres.

Authors:  Matthias Lutz; David Messika-Zeitoun; Tanja K Rudolph; Eberhard Schulz; Jeetendra Thambyrajah; Guy Lloyd; Alexander Lauten; Norbert Frey; Jana Kurucova; Martin Thoenes; Cornelia Deutsch; Peter Bramlage; Richard Paul Steeds
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.