Literature DB >> 2627676

Tissue dosimetry, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling, and cancer risk assessment.

M E Andersen1.   

Abstract

Chemical risk assessment is a complex process that requires integration of various biological data from test species, ultimately producing a prediction of the expected outcome of anticipated human exposure. There are two aspects of this process in which pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling can play an important role: in dosimetry, the process of estimating target tissue dose in the test species, and in extrapolation, the process of generalizing beyond the test species to predict human target tissue dose for various ambient exposure conditions. Mechanistic information on the cancer process is crucial in selecting the appropriate measure of target tissue dose: i.e., is it tissue exposure to parent chemical, tissue exposure to stable or reactive metabolite(s), occupancy of critical cellular receptors by parent or metabolite, or some measure of cytotoxicity with concomitant reparative hyperplasia? (This is not intended, by the way, to be an exhaustive list of the potential measures of tissue dose associated with cancer induction). With a presumed carcinogenic mechanism and its appropriate measure of tissue dose in mind, a pharmacokinetic model can then be developed to quantitate this measure of target tissue dose for various exposure conditions. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PB-PK) modeling is the preferred modeling strategy since it is more readily amenable to the interspecies extrapolation necessary to calculate human tissue dose. This essay focuses on the issues of what constitutes an appropriate measure of tissue dose and of how PB-PK models can be developed to estimate tissue dose for chemicals which cause cancer by differing mechanisms. It outlines preliminary attempts to include information on cytotoxicity into a quantitative risk assessment process. Quantitative, extrapolable cytotoxicity models are necessary to conduct biologically valid risk assessments for those chemicals whose primary effect is overt cellular toxicity instead of direct chemical interaction with cellular DNA. Rational, comprehensive risk assessments will only be possible with the advent of descriptions which combine information on both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics into a single integrated model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2627676     DOI: 10.1007/bf00118411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol        ISSN: 0742-2091            Impact factor:   6.691


  6 in total

Review 1.  Carcinogenesis modeling: from molecular biology to epidemiology.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: principles and applications.

Authors:  L E Gerlowski; R K Jain
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 3.  Saturable metabolism and its relationship to toxicity.

Authors:  M E Andersen
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Risk assessment extrapolations and physiological modeling.

Authors:  H J Clewell; M E Andersen
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetics and the risk assessment process for methylene chloride.

Authors:  M E Andersen; H J Clewell; M L Gargas; F A Smith; R H Reitz
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; A G Knudson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.506

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for nicotine and cotinine in man.

Authors:  D E Robinson; N J Balter; S L Schwartz
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.