| Literature DB >> 26276730 |
Takashi Kobayashi1, Naohisa Miyakoshi2, Eiji Abe3, Toshiki Abe4, Kazuma Kikuchi5, Yoichi Shimada6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Crystal-induced arthritis of the lateral atlantoaxial joint may be intimately involved in acute neck pain in the elderly. Patients typically have a good prognosis, and symptoms usually subside within a few weeks. On the other hand, septic arthritis of the lateral atlantoaxial joint requires early diagnosis and antibiotic treatment. Diagnostic delay is a risk factor for an unfavorable outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis. Even though septic arthritis of the lateral atlantoaxial joint is a very rare clinical entity, it is important to differentiate septic arthritis from crystal-induced arthritis. CASEEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26276730 PMCID: PMC4537593 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-015-0651-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Case Rep ISSN: 1752-1947
Fig. 1Plain lateral radiograph on admission. The atlantoaxial distance is 7mm (bidirectional arrow)
Fig. 2Computed tomography on admission. Erosive changes of the bilateral lateral masses of the atlas (open arrows) are visible
Fig. 3Magnetic resonance imaging on admission. Sagittal imaging (a, b) shows cord compression due to a pseudotumor around the dens (open arrow). Axial imaging shows heterogeneously low signal intensity around the left lateral atlantoaxial joint on T1-weighted imaging (c, arrows) and high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging (d, arrows)
Fig. 4Anterior-posterior (a) and lateral (b) radiography after radiopaque contrast is injected to lateral atlantoaxial joint. Radiopaque contrast did not go around the dens
Fig. 5Plain radiography 7 years after operation. Plain lateral radiography shows complete bone union (arrows)
Comparison of crystal-induced arthritis and septic arthritis of the lateral atlantoaxial joint
| Crystal-induced arthritis | Septic arthritis | |
|---|---|---|
| Neck pain | Severe | Severe |
| Symptom duration from onset | Resolves within 9 days | Persists for several months without appropriate treatment |
| Computed tomography | Calcification around the dens | Bone destruction of C1 and/or C2 |
| Magnetic resonance imaging | No marked changes | Joint effusion |
| Prognosis | Good | Poor without appropriate treatment |