Literature DB >> 26276717

Integrated proteo-genomic approach for early diagnosis and prognosis of cancer.

Hem D Shukla1, Javed Mahmood2, Zeljko Vujaskovic3.   

Abstract

Cancer is the leading cause of mortality among men and women worldwide. Despite the availability of numerous diagnostic techniques for various cancers, the overall survival rate remains low and the majority of patients die due to late diagnosis and advanced stage of the disease. Diagnosing and treating cancer at its early stages ideally during the precancerous phase could significantly increase survival rate with the possibility of cure and prolong survival. Cancer is a genetic disease and it is illicitly activated by the acquisition of somatic DNA lesions and aberrations in genome structure and defects in maintenance and repair. These somatic DNA mutations known as driver mutations seem to be the prime cause in initiating tumorigenesis. The advances in genomic technologies have immensely facilitated the understanding of cancer progression and metastasis, and the discovery of novel biomarkers. However, changes in somatic mutational landscape of the oncogenome are translated into aberrantly regulated oncoproteome which drives the cancer initiation. Thus, combination of proteomic and genomic technologies is urgently required to discover biomarkers for early diagnosis. The recent advances in human genome based detection of cancer using advanced genomic technologies like NextGen Sequencing, digital PCR, cfDNA technology have shown promise; for example oncogenic somatic mutation variants, transcriptomic analysis, copy number variant, and methylation data from the Cancer Genome Atlas. Similarly, oncoproteomics has the potential to revolutionize clinical management of the disease, including cancer diagnosis and screening based on new proteomic database which embodies somatic variants and post translational modifications, thus devising proteomic technologies as a complement to histopathology. Further, the use of multiple proteomic and genomic biomarkers rather than a single gene or protein could greatly improve diagnostic accuracy and enhance the predictive power for treatment outcome and may enable adequate monitoring of the response to treatment and could be an important option for personalized medicine. The proteogenomic approach has the promise to identify new biomarkers for radiation therapy (RT) which could reliably predict the tumor radiation resistance and which could also accurately predict normal tissue toxicity, and at the same time radiotherapy effectiveness. In this review we have summarize the recent advances in proteogenomic approaches to develop more sensitive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers which could be translated into improved clinical care and management of the disease. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early detection; Proteogenomics; RNAseq database; Radiation resistance; Radiation therapy (RT); cfDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276717     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  12 in total

1.  Serum Proteomic Signatures of Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eleni Zografos; Athanasios K Anagnostopoulos; Aggeliki Papadopoulou; Evangelia Legaki; Flora Zagouri; Evangelos Marinos; George T Tsangaris; Maria Gazouli
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.069

2.  Personalized Approach to Determination of Histidine-Rich Glycoprotein and E-Cadherin in Supernatants of Immunocompetent Blood Cells and Breast Biopsy Specimens in Breast Malignant and Non-Malignant Disease.

Authors:  A I Autenshlyus; A V Bernado; A A Studenikina; A V Proskura; K I Davletova; I P Zhurakovskiy; S A Arkhipov; N A Varaksin; S V Sidorov; V V Lyakhovich
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 0.788

3.  pH-Responsive fluorescent graphene quantum dots for fluorescence-guided cancer surgery and diagnosis.

Authors:  Zetan Fan; Shixin Zhou; Cesar Garcia; Louzhen Fan; Jiangbing Zhou
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 7.790

4.  SIGNALING PATHWAYS AS BIOMARKERS.

Authors:  Anagh A Sahasrabuddhe; Delphine C M Rolland; Pinaki P Banerjee
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2016-02-14

Review 5.  Comprehensive Analysis of Cancer-Proteogenome to Identify Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cancer.

Authors:  Hem D Shukla
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2017-10-25

6.  Prognostic role of methylated GSTP1, p16, ESR1 and PITX2 in patients with breast cancer: A systematic meta-analysis under the guideline of PRISMA.

Authors:  Xianneng Sheng; Yu Guo; Yang Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Radiation-induced erectile dysfunction: Recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Javed Mahmood; Aksinija A Shamah; T Michael Creed; Radmila Pavlovic; Hotaka Matsui; Masaki Kimura; Jason Molitoris; Hem Shukla; Isabel Jackson; Zeljko Vujaskovic
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-03

8.  Exploring targeted therapy of osteosarcoma using proteomics data.

Authors:  Parunya Chaiyawat; Jongkolnee Settakorn; Apiruk Sangsin; Pimpisa Teeyakasem; Jeerawan Klangjorhor; Aungsumalee Soongkhaw; Dumnoensun Pruksakorn
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Practical aspects of NGS-based pathways analysis for personalized cancer science and medicine.

Authors:  Ekaterina A Kotelnikova; Mikhail Pyatnitskiy; Anna Paleeva; Olga Kremenetskaya; Dmitriy Vinogradov
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-09

10.  Adopting solutions for annotation and reporting of next generation sequencing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Jinming Song; Mohammad Hussaini
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2020-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.