Literature DB >> 26276300

The Glass Houses of Attending Surgeons: An Assessment of Unprofessional Behavior on Facebook Among Practicing Surgeons.

Sean J Langenfeld1, Craig Sudbeck2, Thomas Luers2, Peter Adamson2, Gates Cook2, Paul J Schenarts2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our recent publication demonstrated that unprofessional behavior on Facebook is common among surgical residents. In the formulation of standards and curricula to address this issue, it is important that surgical faculty lead by example. Our current study refocuses on the Facebook profiles of faculty surgeons involved in the education of general surgery residents.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) web site was used to identify general surgery residencies located in the Midwest. Departmental web sites were then searched to identify teaching faculty for the general surgery residency. Facebook was then searched to determine which faculty had profiles available for viewing by the general public. Profiles were then placed in 1 of the 3 following categories: professional, potentially unprofessional, or clearly unprofessional. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A chi-square test was used to determine significance.
RESULTS: In all, 57 residency programs were identified on the ACS web site, 100% of which provided an institutional web site listing the surgical faculty. A total of 758 general surgery faculty were identified (133 women and 625 men), of which 195 (25.7%) had identifiable Facebook accounts. In all, 165 faculty (84.6%) had no unprofessional content, 20 (10.3%) had potentially unprofessional content, and 10 (5.1%) had clearly unprofessional content. Inter-rater reliability was good (88.9% agreement, κ = 0.784). Clearly unprofessional behavior was found only in male surgeons. For male surgeons, clearly unprofessional behavior was more common among those in practice for less than 5 years (p = 0.031). Alcohol and politics were the most commonly found variables in the potentially unprofessional group. Inappropriate language and sexually suggestive material were the most commonly found variables in the clearly unprofessional group.
CONCLUSIONS: Unprofessional behavior on Facebook is less common among surgical faculty compared with surgical residents. However, the rates remain unacceptably high, especially among men and those in practice for less than 5 years. Education on the dangers of social media should not be limited to residents but should instead be extended to attending surgeons as well.
Copyright © 2015 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facebook; Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; marketing; privacy; professionalism; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276300     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  6 in total

Review 1.  History of Social Media in Surgery.

Authors:  Heather J Logghe; Cedrek L McFadden; Natalie J Tully; Christian Jones
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

Review 2.  How Can Social Media Get Us in Trouble?

Authors:  Sean J Langenfeld; Rishi Batra
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

3.  Evolving use of social media among Chinese urologists: Opportunity or challenge?

Authors:  Xingbo Long; Lin Qi; Zhenyu Ou; Xiongbing Zu; Zhenzhen Cao; Xiting Zeng; Yuan Li; Minfeng Chen; Zhao Wang; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Tea Vukušić Rukavina; Joško Viskić; Lovela Machala Poplašen; Danko Relić; Marko Marelić; Drazen Jokic; Kristijan Sedak
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Social Media in Professional Medicine: New Resident Perceptions and Practices.

Authors:  Cedric Lefebvre; Jason Mesner; Jason Stopyra; James O'Neill; Iltifat Husain; Carol Geer; Karen Gerancher; Hal Atkinson; Erin Harper; William Huang; David M Cline
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Antiparkinson drugs in paranoid schizophrenia.

Authors:  J O Cavenar; E R Braasch; J L Sullivan
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  1979-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.