Literature DB >> 26275797

A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK.

H Y Yap1, J D Nixon2.   

Abstract

Energy recovery from municipal solid waste plays a key role in sustainable waste management and energy security. However, there are numerous technologies that vary in suitability for different economic and social climates. This study sets out to develop and apply a multi-criteria decision making methodology that can be used to evaluate the trade-offs between the benefits, opportunities, costs and risks of alternative energy from waste technologies in both developed and developing countries. The technologies considered are mass burn incineration, refuse derived fuel incineration, gasification, anaerobic digestion and landfill gas recovery. By incorporating qualitative and quantitative assessments, a preference ranking of the alternative technologies is produced. The effect of variations in decision criteria weightings are analysed in a sensitivity analysis. The methodology is applied principally to compare and assess energy recovery from waste options in the UK and India. These two countries have been selected as they could both benefit from further development of their waste-to-energy strategies, but have different technical and socio-economic challenges to consider. It is concluded that gasification is the preferred technology for the UK, whereas anaerobic digestion is the preferred technology for India. We believe that the presented methodology will be of particular value for waste-to-energy decision-makers in both developed and developing countries.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); Benefits Opportunities Costs and Risks (BOCR); Energy policy; Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); Waste-to-Energy (WtE)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26275797     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  3 in total

1.  A multi-criteria decision analysis of management alternatives for anaerobically digested kraft pulp mill sludge.

Authors:  Martijn Eikelboom; Alice do Carmo Precci Lopes; Claudio Mudadu Silva; Fábio de Ávila Rodrigues; Antônio José Vinha Zanuncio; José Cola Zanuncio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Sandylove Afrane; Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah; Ephraim Bonah Agyekum; Prince Oppong Amoh; Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf; Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah; Ebenezer Agbozo; Elmazeg Elgamli; Mokhtar Shouran; Guozhu Mao; Salah Kamel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  A group decision making tool for assessing climate policy risks against multiple criteria.

Authors:  Alexandros Nikas; Haris Doukas; Luis Martínez López
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-03-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.