Literature DB >> 26275579

Minimally invasive medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability using an artificial ligament: A two year follow-up.

Aditya Khemka1, Sarah J Lord2, Zelda Doyle3, Belinda Bosley4, Munjed Al Muderis5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of acute patellar dislocation affects approximately 30% of individuals, and up to 75% of those with grade IV instability. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is considered to be critical for patellar stabilization. MPFL reconstruction with allografts has been proposed to reduce risk of recurrence, but there is limited evidence about the safety and effectiveness of techniques using synthetic allografts.
METHODS: We present a retrospective case series of 29 individuals who underwent a MPFL reconstruction between 2009 and 2012, using an artificial ligament for patellar instability by a single surgeon. Clinical, radiological and functional outcomes were measured at a minimum of 24 months.
RESULTS: 31 knees (29 individuals) were followed up for a median of 43 (range: 24-68) months. Using the Crosby and Insall grading system, 21 (68%) were graded as excellent, nine (29%) were good, one (3%) as fair and none as worse at 24 months. The mean improvement in Lysholm knee score for knee instability was 68 points (standard deviation 10). Ligamentous laxity was seen in 17 (55%) of individuals. In this subset, 12 were graded as excellent, four as good and one as fair. The mean improvement in patellar height was 11% at three months follow-up. All knees had a stable graft fixation with one re-dislocation following trauma.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose a minimally invasive technique to reconstruct the MPFL using an artificial ligament allowing early mobilization without bracing. This study indicates the procedure is safe, with a low risk of re-dislocation in all grades of instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case Series.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial ligament; Medial patellofemoral ligament; No bracing; Patella; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26275579     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Soft-tissue fixation is not inferior to suture-anchor fixation in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using a nonresorbable suture tape.

Authors:  Felix Zimmermann; Mareike Schonhoff; Sebastian Jäger; Danko Dan Milinkovic; Jochen Franke; Paul Alfred Grützner; Peter Balcarek; Sven Vetter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.114

2.  Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using nonresorbable sutures yields comparable outcomes to reconstruction with a pedicled quadriceps tendon autograft when performed in addition to bony risk factor correction.

Authors:  Danko Dan Milinkovic; Felix Zimmermann; Peter Balcarek
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 3.  Suture Anchors Fixation in MPFL Reconstruction using a Bioactive Synthetic Ligament.

Authors:  Massimo Berruto; Paolo Ferrua; Daniele Tradati; Francesco Uboldi; Eva Usellini; Bruno Michele Marelli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-09-05

4.  Synthetic graft for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Filippo Spiezia; Matthias Knobe; Frank Hildebrand; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-22

5.  Synthetic versus autologous reconstruction (Syn-VAR) of the medial patellofemoral ligament: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Adam Tucker; Sam McMahon; Bronwyn McArdle; Bridgeen Rutherford; Danny Acton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.