Literature DB >> 26275236

Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.

B Vaseghi1, M Zoghi2, S Jaberzadeh1.   

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) over cortical regions of the pain neuromatrix, including the primary motor (M1), sensory (S1) and dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC) cortices on M1/S1 excitability, sensory (STh), and pain thresholds (PTh) in healthy adults. The secondary aim was to evaluate the placebo effects of c-tDCS on induced cortical and behavioural changes. Before, immediately after and 30 min after c-tDCS the amplitude of N20-P25 components of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under four different experimental conditions. STh and PTh for peripheral electrical and mechanical stimulation were also evaluated. c-tDCS of 0.3 mA was applied for 20 min. A blinded assessor evaluated all outcome measures. c-tDCS of M1, S1 and DLPFC significantly decreased the corticospinal excitability of M1 (P < 0.05) for at least 30 min. Following the application of c-tDCS over S1, M1 and DLPFC, the amplitude of the N20-P25 component of SEPs decreased for at least 30 min (P < 0.05). Compared with baseline values, significant STh and PTh increases were observed after c-tDCS of these three sites. Decreasing the level of S1 and M1 excitability, following S1, M1 and DLPFC stimulation, confirmed the functional connectivities between these cortical sites involved in pain processing. Furthermore, increasing the level of STh/PTh after c-tDCS of these sites indicated that stimulation of not only M1 but also S1 and DLPFC could be considered a technique to decrease the level of pain in patients.
© 2015 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation; motor evoked potential; pain threshold; sensory evoked potential; sensory threshold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26275236     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  11 in total

1.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Ludovica Labruna; Alkomiet Hasan; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Noninvasive motor cortex stimulation effects on quantitative sensory testing in healthy and chronic pain subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Piero F Mejia-Pando; Maria A Luna-Cuadros; Judah L Barouh; Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros; Ludmilla Candido-Santos; Alice Barra; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.926

3.  Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.

Authors:  Wolfgang Strube; Tilmann Bunse; Michael A Nitsche; Alexandra Nikolaeva; Ulrich Palm; Frank Padberg; Peter Falkai; Alkomiet Hasan
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2016-08

4.  Brain oscillations reflecting pain-related behavior in freely moving rats.

Authors:  Weiwei Peng; Xiaolei Xia; Ming Yi; Gan Huang; Zhiguo Zhang; Giandomenico Iannetti; Li Hu
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Somatosensory lateral inhibition processes modulate motor response inhibition - an EEG source localization study.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Paradoxical, causal effects of sensory gain modulation on motor inhibitory control - a tDCS, EEG-source localization study.

Authors:  Julia Friedrich; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Shafiq Ahmad; Moath Alatefi; Ali Hamza; Mohamed Sharaf; Shirely Fecteau; Woo Kyoung Yoo
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-07

8.  Immediate and after effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Carlos A Sánchez-León; Isabel Cordones; Claudia Ammann; José M Ausín; María A Gómez-Climent; Alejandro Carretero-Guillén; Guillermo Sánchez-Garrido Campos; Agnès Gruart; José M Delgado-García; Guy Cheron; Javier F Medina; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Aurore Thibaut; Beatriz Costa; Isadora Ferreira; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.166

10.  Top-Down Effect of Direct Current Stimulation on the Nociceptive Response of Rats.

Authors:  Luiz Fabio Dimov; Adriano Cardozo Franciosi; Ana Carolina Pinheiro Campos; André Russowsky Brunoni; Rosana Lima Pagano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.