Literature DB >> 26275007

Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy for the prevention of ovarian cancers: What is happening in Italy?

Roberta Venturella1, Morena Rocca, Daniela Lico, Simona Trapasso, Annalisa Di Cello, Salvatore Gizzo, Fulvio Zullo, Michele Morelli.   

Abstract

In 2011, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada encouraged physicians to discuss with their patients the risks and benefits of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy (PBS) at the time of hysterectomy or tubal ligation for prevention of ovarian cancers (OCs). The aim of this study was to examine obstetrician-gynaecologists' knowledge, opinions and practice patterns relating to opportunistic salpingectomy in the general population. An anonymous electronic survey was sent to residents, academic and hospital staff in Italian OBGYN departments. The survey included questions on demographics, knowledge and attitudes in terms of the implementation of PBS in women at average population risk of OC. At least 80% of the 479 respondents reported performing PBS during hysterectomy for benign indications, chiefly with the intent of OC risk reduction but also to decrease the risk of reoperation and subsequent tubal pathologies. Among the 86 colleagues who do not routinely perform PBS, more than 50% stated that they have doubts regarding the benefits associated with the procedure. Most of the respondents declared that they were familiar with the literature on the topic and were aware of the data reporting the safety of the procedure, and only 21 (4.53%) had never heard of PBS. Over 40% of the respondents worked in hospitals in southern Italy. PBS as a prophylactic measure to reduce the incidence of OC is a well-known strategy among the Italian OBGYNs interviewed. Given the unequal distribution of respondents, however, wider educational initiatives should be undertaken, at least in Italy, to increase the implementation of salpingectomy among OBGYNs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26275007     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  7 in total

1.  The Fallopian Tube in the 21st Century: When, Why, and How to Consider Removal.

Authors:  Roberta Venturella; Michele Morelli; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-09-17

2.  Incidental (Prophylactic) Salpingectomy at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and Cesarean Section: a Survey of Practice in Austria.

Authors:  F L Potz; G Tomasch; S Polterauer; R Laky; C Marth; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Opportunistic salpingectomy at benign gynecological surgery for reducing ovarian cancer risk: a 10-year single centre experience from China and a literature review.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Hui Du; Lewen Bao; Wenxin Liu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Prophylactic salpingectomy and ovarian cancer: An evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  Tricia Dewi Anggraeni; Adly Nanda Al Fattah; Raymond Surya
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

5.  Should national societies recommend opportunistic salpingectomy?

Authors:  Karl Tamussino
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG).

Authors:  Miseon Kim; Young-Han Kim; Yong Beom Kim; Jayeon Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Mi Hye Park; Joo Hyun Park; Jeong Ho Rhee; Myong Cheol Lim; Joon-Seok Hong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-09-07

7.  Physician attitudes and knowledge on prophylactic salpingectomy in perimenopausal patients.

Authors:  Michael Fialkow; Neko Castleberry; Jason D Wright; Jay Schulkin; Vrunda B Desai
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.