| Literature DB >> 26274947 |
Marcos Couto1, Carina Sánchez2, Belén Dávila3, Valentina Machín4, Javier Varela5, Guzmán Álvarez6, Mauricio Cabrera1, Laura Celano7, Beatriz Aguirre-López8, Nallely Cabrera9, Marieta Tuena de Gómez-Puyou8, Armando Gómez-Puyou8, Ruy Pérez-Montfort8, Hugo Cerecetto10, Mercedes González11.
Abstract
The current pharmacological Chagas disease treatments, using Nifurtimox or Benznidazole, show limited therapeutic results and are associated with potential side effects, like mutagenicity. Using random screening we have identified new chemotypes that were able to inhibit relevant targets of the Trypanosoma cruzi. We found 3H-[1,2]dithioles with the ability to inhibit Trypanosoma cruzi triosephosphate isomerase (TcTIM). Herein, we studied the structural modifications of this chemotype to analyze the influence of volume, lipophilicity and electronic properties in the anti-T. cruzi activity. Their selectivity to parasites vs. mammalian cells was also examined. To get insights into a possible mechanism of action, the inhibition of the enzymatic activity of TcTIM and cruzipain, using the isolated enzymes, and the inhibition of membrane sterol biosynthesis and excreted metabolites, using the whole parasite, were achieved. We found that this structural framework is interesting for the generation of innovative drugs for the treatment of Chagas disease.Entities:
Keywords: 1H-NMR metabolomics; 3H-1,2-dithiole; anti-T. cruzi activity; cruzipain; membrane sterol biosynthesis; triosephosphate isomerase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26274947 PMCID: PMC6332334 DOI: 10.3390/molecules200814595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(A) Structures of the new hits, belonging to 3H-[1,2]dithiole chemotype and identified as TcTIM inhibitors; (B) Structure of our best TcTIM inhibitor described to date [11]; (C) Structure of oltipraz.
Figure 2Synthetic procedures used to prepare the dithiole derivatives.
Effects of the studied compounds against epimastigotes of T. cruzi (Tulahuen 2 strain) and murine macrophages (J774.1). The experiments were done in triplicate.
| Family | Derivative | IC50 against | IC50 against Macrophages (μM) | SI | miLogP a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| >25 | - b | - | 4.66 | |
| >25 | - | - | 3.57 | ||
| 25.0 ± 1.0 | 51 ± 2 | 2.0 | 3.04 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 5.21 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 7.26 | ||
| 25.0 ± 0.5 | 63 ± 2 | 2.5 | 7.20 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 3.12 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 4.72 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 5.91 | ||
|
| 7.7 ± 1.4 | 24 ± 1 | 3.1 | 3.16 | |
| 5.5 ± 0.9 | 34.0 ± 0.5 | 6.2 | 6.28 | ||
| 4.9 ± 1.1 | 63 ± 2 | 12.8 | 8.50 | ||
| 5.9 ± 1.2 | <24.0 | <4.1 | 3.61 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 6.82 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 8.77 | ||
|
| >25 | - | 3.25 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 4.07 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 2.60 | ||
| >25 | - | - | 3.78 |
a LoP determined using Molinspiration online property calculation toolkit [20]. b -: not determined.
Inhibition of enzymatic activity of TcTIM and cruzipain. The experiments were done in triplicate.
| Family | Derivative | Cruzipain | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Inhib200 a | % Inhib25 a | IC50 (μM) | % Inhib100 a | IC50 (μM) | ||
|
| 77 | 33 ± 1.9 | - b | 21.3 ± 0.3 | - | |
| 86 | 80 ± 2.3 | 1.2 ± 0.05 | 89.0 ± 0.5 | 4.0 ± 2.0 | ||
| 71 | 35 ± 3.0 | - | 59.3 ± 0.3 | - | ||
| 14 | - | - | 78.4 ± 0.6 | - | ||
| ns c | - | - | 58.0 ± 0.1 | - | ||
| 50 | - | - | 77.9 ± 0.6 | - | ||
| 70 | 61 ± 1.0 | - | 73.9 ± 0.1 | - | ||
| ns | - | - | 96.3 ± 0.7 | 17.1 ± 3.6 | ||
| 70 | ni d | - | 91.5 ± 0.6 | 21.6 ± 6.1 | ||
|
| 72 | 48 ± 4.0 | - | 91.3 ± 2.8 | 15.5 ± 2.7 | |
| 86 | 75 ± 6.0 | 3.35 ± 0.14 | 61.0 ± 0.3 | - | ||
| 70 | 38 ± 3.5 | - | 66.5 ± 0.3 | - | ||
| 86 | 62 ± 3.0 | - | 85.4 ± 0.2 | 15.1 ± 2.5 | ||
| 77 | 63 ± 0.1 | 7.53 ± 0.10 | 62.3 ± 0.3 | - | ||
| 81 | 52 ± 2.5 | - | 82.6 ± 0.6 | - | ||
|
| 70 | 75 ± 0.3 | 11.03 ±0.03 | 77.1 ± 0.1 | - | |
| 95 | 73 ± 3.2 | 3.26 ± 0.05 | 90.5 ± 0.7 | 11.3 ± 0.6 | ||
| ns | - | - | 72.0 ± 0.1 | - | ||
| 65 | - | - | 90.2 ± 0.6 | 17.7 ± 3.9 | ||
a % Inhib: percentage of enzymatic inhibition at 200, 100 or 25 μM. b -: not determined. c ns: not studied. d ni: not inhibition.
Figure 3Example of a TLC for the study of changes in membrane sterols of T. cruzi. The lane labeled Control had untreated parasites. Terbinafine was used as a control of an accumulator of squalene for T. cruzi.
Concentrations of metabolites excreted, carboxylic acids and amino acids, in the metabolomic studies using 1H-NMR (for details see Experimental Section). Each run was made in triplicate.
| Compound a/ | Gly | Succ | Pyr | Ace | Ala | Lac |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite b | ||||||
| 2 | 2.11 ± 0.11 c | 5.83 ± 0.24 | 8.00 ± 0.35 | 23.28 ± 0.86 | 17.76 ± 0.61 | 8.73 ± 0.37 |
| 14 | 2.48 ± 0.14 | 7.34 ± 0.65 | 9.47 ± 0.53 | 26.41 ± 1.44 | 20.65 ± 1.27 | 10.41 ± 0.58 |
| Control d | 2.48 ± 0.11 | 6.64 ± 0.18 | 8.89 ± 0.27 | 26.06 ± 2.07 | 21.38 ± 1.15 | 9.69 ± 0.68 |
a Working at the IC50 × 2 for each fraction. b The concentrations of the metabolites were calculated using DMF as the internal standard (for details see Experimental Section). c Statistically significant changes (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test) are shown in bold characters. d Untreated parasite.
Figure 4Possible site of action for derivative 2 in the biochemical pathways, according to the 1H-NMR metabolomic studies [27].
Figure 5Summary of the identified 3-(alkylthio)propylidene-3H-[1,2]dithiole derivatives as the best anti-T. cruzi agents.