Literature DB >> 26274382

Harmonic Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Guidance of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Solid Pancreatic Masses.

Andrada Seicean1, Radu Badea1, Anca Moldovan-Pop1, Simona Vultur1, Emil Claudiu Botan1, Teodor Zaharie1, Adrian Săftoiu2, Teodora Mocan1, Cornel Iancu1, Florin Graur1, Zeno Sparchez1, Radu Seicean3.   

Abstract

Purpose The global accuracy of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is about 85 %. The use of contrast agents during EUS to highlight vessels and the necrotic parts of pancreatic masses may improve biopsy guidance. Our aim was to assess whether the guidance of FNA by harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) would increase diagnostic accuracy relative to conventional EUS-FNA in the same pancreatic masses. Patients and Methods In a prospective study, EUS-FNA was performed in patients with pancreatic masses on CT scan, followed by harmonic CH-EUS using SonoVue. A second cluster of CH-EUS-FNA was performed on contrast-enhanced images. The final diagnosis was based on the results of EUS-FNA and surgery, or the findings after 12 months' follow-up. Results The final diagnosis was adenocarcinoma (n = 35), chronic pancreatitis (n = 10), or other (n = 6). The diagnostic accuracy based on core histology was 78.4 % for EUS-FNA and 86.5 % for CH-EUS-FNA (p = 0.35). The accuracy increased to 94 % when the two methods' results were combined. The two false-negative EUS-FNA cases were correctly appreciated by CH-EUS. Neither core histology size nor the presence of necrosis was significant for the true-positive diagnosis of malignancy. Conclusion CH-EUS-FNA had an insignificant incremental effect on diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional EUS-FNA in our small group. The presence of necrosis did not influence the results of CEUS-FNA. Qualitative assessment of the contrast uptake within the lesion was useful in false-negative EUS-FNA cases. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26274382     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1553496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  12 in total

Review 1.  Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Andrada Seicean; Ofelia Mosteanu; Radu Seicean
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biopsy of Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Vlad Andrei Ichim; Romeo Ioan Chira; Georgiana Anca Nagy; Alexandra Chira; Petru Adrian Mircea
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Enhancement patterns in the venous phase of contrast-enhanced ultrasounds: diagnostic value for patients with solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Xueqi Chen; Fengzhi Hao; Yang Gui; Jing Zhang; Li Tan; Mengsu Xiao; Qing Zhang; Hua Meng; Jianchu Li; Yuxin Jiang; Ke Lv
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-10

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology.

Authors:  Sriharsha Gummadi; John R Eisenbrey; Andrej Lyshchik
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-11

5.  Is contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy better than conventional fine needle biopsy? A retrospective study in a medical center.

Authors:  Jian-Han Lai; Ching-Chung Lin; Hsiang-Hung Lin; Ming-Jen Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound: Future perspectives.

Authors:  Masayuki Kitano; Ken Kamata
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 7.  Harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration: Fact or fiction?

Authors:  Andrada Seicean; Mariana Jinga
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 8.  The role of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Adrian Saftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 9.  A quarter century of EUS-FNA: Progress, milestones, and future directions.

Authors:  Irina Mihaela Cazacu; Adriana Alexandra Luzuriaga Chavez; Adrian Saftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 10.  Efforts to improve the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Akane Yamabe; Atsushi Irisawa; Manoop S Bhutani; Goro Shibukawa; Mariko Fujisawa; Ai Sato; Yoshitsugu Yoshida; Noriyuki Arakawa; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Ryo Igarashi; Takumi Maki; Shogo Yamamoto
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.