Literature DB >> 26273741

Intracranial pressure monitoring among children with severe traumatic brain injury.

Aziz S Alali1,2,3, David Gomez1,3, Chethan Sathya1,3,4, Randall S Burd5, Todd G Mainprize6, Richard Moulton2, Richard A Falcone7, Charles de Mestral1,3, Avery Nathens1,3,4,8.   

Abstract

OBJECT Well-designed studies linking intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring with improved outcomes among children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are lacking. The main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between ICP monitoring in children and in-hospital mortality following severe TBI. METHODS An observational study was conducted using data derived from 153 adult or mixed (adult and pediatric) trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) and 29 pediatric trauma centers participating in the pediatric pilot TQIP between 2010 and 2012. Random-intercept multilevel modeling was used to examine the association between ICP monitoring and in-hospital mortality among children with severe TBI ≤16 years of age after adjusting for important confounders. This association was evaluated at the patient level and at the hospital level. In a sensitivity analysis, this association was reexamined in a propensity-matched cohort. RESULTS A total of 1705 children with severe TBI were included in the study cohort. The overall in-hospital mortality was 14.3% of patients (n = 243), whereas the mortality of the 273 patients (16%) who underwent invasive ICP monitoring was 11% (n = 30). After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level characteristics, ICP monitoring was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.85; p = 0.01). It is possible that patients who were managed with ICP monitoring were selected because of an anticipated favorable or unfavorable outcome. To further address this potential selection bias, the analysis was repeated with the hospital-specific rate of ICP monitoring use as the exposure. The adjusted OR for death of children treated at high ICP-use hospitals was 0.49 compared with those treated at low ICP-use hospitals (95% CI 0.31-0.78; p = 0.003). Variations in ICP monitoring use accounted for 15.9% of the interhospital variation in mortality among children with severe TBI. Similar results were obtained after analyzing the data using propensity score-matching methods. CONCLUSIONS In this observational study, ICP monitoring use was associated with lower hospital mortality at both the patient and hospital levels. However, the contribution of variable ICP monitoring rates to interhospital variation in pediatric TBI mortality was modest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS = American College of Surgeons; AIS = Abbreviated Injury Scale; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; ICD-9-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; ICP = intracranial pressure; MOR = median odds ratio; PCV = proportional change in variance; TBI = traumatic brain injury; TQIP = Trauma Quality Improvement Program; head injury; intracranial pressure; multilevel analysis; propensity score; trauma; traumatic brain injury

Year:  2015        PMID: 26273741     DOI: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Patient.

Authors:  Christopher M Horvat; Haifa Mtaweh; Michael J Bell
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.420

2.  Functional Outcome After Intracranial Presuure Monitoring-Reply.

Authors:  Tellen D Bennett; Tom H Greene; Heather T Keenan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 3.  Multimodality neuromonitoring in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Adam M H Young; Mathew R Guilfoyle; Joseph Donnelly; Peter Smielewski; Shruti Agarwal; Marek Czosnyka; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Effects of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring on Mortality in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Liang Shen; Zhuo Wang; Zhongzhou Su; Sheng Qiu; Jie Xu; Yue Zhou; Ai Yan; Rui Yin; Bin Lu; Xiaohu Nie; Shufa Zhao; Renfu Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Characteristic Features, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Takashi Araki; Hiroyuki Yokota; Akio Morita
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Intracranial pressure monitoring associated with increased mortality in pediatric brain injuries.

Authors:  Patrick T Delaplain; Areg Grigorian; Michael Lekawa; Michael Mallicote; Victor Joe; Sebastian D Schubl; Catherine M Kuza; Matthew Dolich; Jeffry Nahmias
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 7.  The Significance of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Reducing Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nianchen Han; Fan Yang; Xianghe Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Early Experience of Automated Intraventricular Type Intracranial Pressure Monitoring (LiquoGuard®) for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Young Sub Kwon; Yun Ho Lee; Jin Mo Cho
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-04-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.