| Literature DB >> 26273401 |
Dengrui Li1, Sumin Guo1, Hui Li1, Guiyun Zhu1, Li Gao2, Xin Xin2, Dandan Yan2, Xiuwu Li1, Shujun Geng1, Hongwei Hou1, Yonghui Yang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma, the most common form of lung cancer, is one of main human malignant tumors. In this paper, we focus on the effect of antitumor activity of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells on human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549.Entities:
Keywords: A549 cells; CIK cells; inhibit
Year: 2014 PMID: 26273401 PMCID: PMC4511324 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
Figure 1Expansion of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells in cultures supplemented with cytokines. The absolute number of CIK cells (CD3+CD16+CD56+) were analyzed by flow cytometry after the provision of interferon-gamma, interleukin-2 and αCD3 mAb to the cultures. Numbers in outlined areas indicate percentage of cells. Results of one representative experiment showing the percentages of CD3+CD16+CD56+ cells. Data are representative of six separate experiments each involving groups of two cultures.
Figure 2Effects of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells on cell cytotoxicity in A549 cells determined by MTS assay. Results are expressed as % of control (n = 6. Mean ± standard deviation. BP < 0.05, CP < 0.01 vs. the control group). Analysis of variance with subsequent multiple comparisons test. ▪, 24 hours; □, 48 hours; , 72 hours.
Effect of CIK cells on cell cycle distribution in A549 cells
| Group (μg/mL) | Cell cycle distribution (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| G0/G1 | S | G2/M | |
| Control | 44.9 ± 1.3 | 35.1 ± 2.5 | 12.4 ± 2.0 |
| Treated | |||
| 10:1 | 51.7 ± 3.3 | 19.7 ± 4.6 | 29.9 ± 3.7 |
| 20:1 | 56.1 ± 5.6 | 10.1 ± 2.7 | 32.1 ± 4.2 |
| 30:1 | 59.1 ± 5.2 | 2.9 ± 1.8 | 38.4 ± 5.0 |
Because of infrequent cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells treated, S and G2/M are combined as G0/G1 changed in A549 cells. Control and treated group (n = 6). A549 cell populations discriminated by CIK cells. Results expressed as mean (%) positive (range). Results are expressed as % of control.
P < 0.05
P < 0.01 versus control.
Figure 3The effect of cell cycle progress in A549 by cytokine-induced killer cells.
Effect of CIK cells on cell apoptosis rate in A549 cells
| Group (μg/mL) | Apoptosis rate (%) | Necrosis rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 |
| Treated | ||
| 10:1 | 6.8 ± 1.0 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| 20:1 | 18.8 ± 3.9 | 7.1 ± 0.8 |
| 40:1 | 22.6 ± 4.1 | 10.9 ± 1.3 |
Because of infrequent cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells treated, the apoptosis rate is different in A549 cells. Control and treated group (n = 6). A549 cell populations discriminated by CIK cells. Results expressed as mean (%) positive (range). Results are expressed as % of control.
P < 0.05
P < 0.01 versus control.
Figure 4The expression of P27 was upregulated in response to cytokine-induced killer cells by Western blot analysis of A549 cells. Analysis of variance with subsequent multiple comparisons test. Control group: lane 1: treated group; lane 2: 10:1 effector-to-target cell (E/T) ratio; lane 3: 20:1 E/T ratio; lane 4: 30:1 E/T ratio. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.