Literature DB >> 26273270

Mannitol-negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swab specimens in Brazil.

Danielle Caldeira Martins dos Santos1, Thaina Miranda da Costa1, Renata Fernandes Rabello2, Fábio Aguiar Alves1, Silvia Susana Bona de Mondino1.   

Abstract

The isolation of mannitol-negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swabs is reported. Among the 59 isolates, 9 (15%) isolates were mannitol-negative; all of these isolates were categorized as staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IVa. This report emphasizes that mannitol fermentation on mannitol salt agar should not be used as the sole criterion when screening nasal swab specimens for S. aureus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; SCCmec; mannitol-negative; nasal swab surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26273270      PMCID: PMC4507547          DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246220140179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains an important cause of nosocomial infections worldwide, with severe consequences for patients and significant healthcare costs. Active surveillance and correct identification of patients colonized with MRSA is an effective infection control strategy that helps prevent the spread of this organism within the hospital environment (Muto ). Mannitol salt agar (MSA) is a conventional medium that is frequently used to screen nasal swab specimens for presumptive MRSA colonization based on the growth of yellow colonies derived from the fermentation of mannitol (Chapman, 1945). However, clinical isolates of mannitol-negative MRSA have been widely reported (Kateete ; Shittu ). The aim of this study was to describe the occurrence of S. aureus strains that do not ferment mannitol on MSA, which is an important screening method for the detection of MRSA colonization. From August 2009 to August 2011 a total of 104 isolates presumed to be S. aureus were obtained via nasal swab surveillance of patients admitted to one public hospital and one private hospital located in the city of Niterói in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The strains were sub-cultured on MSA medium (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Nevada, USA) and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h to confirm mannitol fermentation. Single colonies of Gram-positive, catalase-positive, mannitol-positive or-negative cocci were subjected to the tube coagulase and DNase tests. The tube coagulase test was performed using rabbit plasma (Laborclin, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil). The DNase test was performed by incubating the isolates on DNase agar medium (Oxoid, Cambridge, UK). The isolates were tested for susceptibility to oxacillin (1 μg) and cefoxitin (30 μg) (Cecon, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) using the disk diffusion method, according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2012). DNA extraction was performed as previously described by Pacheco . PCR amplification was performed using the primers 5′- GTG AAG ATA TAC CAA GTG ATT -3′ and 5′- ATG CGC TAT AGA TTG AAA GGA T -3′ (Eurofins, Huntsville, Alabama, USA), which are specific for the mecA gene, according to the methodology proposed by Zhang . PCR to detect the nuc gene was performed according to the method described by Brakstad , using the primers 5′-GCG TTA ACG GAT GGT GAT GTT-3′ and 5′-CAA AGC GCC ACG TTG TAA AAC AGC-3′ (Eurofins, Huntsville, Alabama, USA). A multiplex-PCR assay was performed to characterize staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types I to V in the MRSA strains according to the method developed by Zhang . Of the 104 strains evaluated, 69 (66%) strains were S. aureus, according to the results obtained after PCR amplification of the nuc gene, and 35 (34%) strains were organisms other than S. aureus. The phenotypic characteristics of the strains are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

General phenotypic characteristics of 104 Staphylococcus spp. according to nuc gene PCR results.

nuc PCRMSA* n (%)Coagulase n (%)DNase n (%)



PositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegative
Positive (S. aureus) n = 6959 (86)10 (14)60 (87)9 (13)61 (88)8 (12)
Negative (non-S. aureus) n = 3531 (89)4 (11)035 (100)035 (100)

MSA: mannitol salt agar.

MSA: mannitol salt agar. Among the 69 S. aureus strains, 59 (86%) strains harbored the mecA gene; of these MRSA strains, 15% (9/59) were mannitol-negative but coagulase- and DNase-positive. Of the 59 MRSA isolates examined, 43 (73%) isolates were SCCmec-typeable with the primers used in this study. SCCmec type II was the most common (49%) type, followed by type IV (37%), including sub-types IVa (n = 14), IVb (n = 1), and IVc (n = 1); type III (7%); type I (5%) and type V (2%). The nine mannitol-negative strains were typed as SCCmec IVa. The sensitivity and specificity of each test was calculated to evaluate the performance of the individual tests in the identification of S. aureus. The DNase test was the most sensitive test (88% sensitivity), followed by coagulase and MSA (87% and 86% sensitivity, respectively). The coagulase and DNase tests were the most specific tests (100% specificity). The low specificity of mannitol (11%) for detecting S. aureus could be caused by the large number of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolates that were mannitol-positive. Mannitol-negative S. aureus strains have also been reported by other authors (Kateete ; Shittu ). The identification of nine of these strains was correct based on the positivity of the coagulase and DNase tests. However, the isolation of MRSA strains with negative results for the coagulase (Bertrand ; Del' Alamo ) and DNAse (Rao ) tests was described previously. Comparing the presence of the mecA gene with the specificity of the disk diffusion method, 57 of the 59 MRSA isolates exhibited consistency levels of 100% (57/57) and 75% (43/57) for cefoxitin and oxacilin, respectively. The cefoxitin disk test correlates well with mecA detection using PCR and also remains a good marker for the detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus (Swenson ). However, two of the 59 MRSA isolates were susceptible to both of the antimicrobials tested. This phenotype is known as pre-MRSA, in which the isolate harbors a repressed mecA gene; in this case, contact with β-lactam antibiotics could trigger the expression of the PBP2a protein (Berger-Bächi ). Worldwide, most HA-MRSA isolates are classified as types I, II and III; most CA-MRSA isolates belong to types IV and V (Chambers & Deleo, 2009). The present study detected nasal MRSA isolates carrying SCCmec types I, II, III, IVa, IVb, IVc and V. The most common SCCmec detected was type II; this finding is a significant result that has been reported rarely. Silva-Carvalho verified that SCCmec types III and IV were the most frequent among nasal MRSA isolates from two hospitals located in the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan region. Notably, all of the mannitol-negative MRSA isolates were categorized as type IVa. In our study, we detected 35 CoNS isolates, of which 31 (89%) isolates were mecA-positive. Most of these isolates were mannitol-positive (28/31; 90%) but coagulase- and DNase test-negative. CoNS species that produce acid from mannitol have been described previously (Bannerman ; Kateete ). Carriage of the mecA gene is not exclusive to MRSA and has been reported frequently in several CoNS species isolated from human and animal sources (Mombach Pinheiro Machado ; Black ). This fact emphasizes the importance of CoNS as reservoirs of the mecA gene, which can be transmitted to S. aureus (Barbier ; Tsubakishita ). According to our results, 9 (15%) of the 59 MRSA strains identified in this study were mannitol-negative. Therefore, these strains would not have been detected using mannitol-positive colony growth on MSA as the sole criterion for MRSA screening. Thus, the inclusion of at least two additional tests, such as the coagulase tube and DNase tests, is needed to improve the identification of S. aureus strains and the early detection of patients who are infected or colonized by MRSA.
  19 in total

Review 1.  SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus.

Authors:  Carlene A Muto; John A Jernigan; Belinda E Ostrowsky; Hervé M Richet; William R Jarvis; John M Boyce; Barry M Farr
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  First report of a catalase-negative methicillin-resistant Staphalococcus aureus.

Authors:  Xavier Bertrand; Yves Huguenin; Daniel Talon
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in the community: high homology of SCCmec IVa between Staphylococcus epidermidis and major clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  François Barbier; Etienne Ruppé; David Hernandez; David Lebeaux; Patrice Francois; Benjamin Felix; Adeline Desprez; Aminata Maiga; Paul-Louis Woerther; Kevin Gaillard; Cécile Jeanrot; Michel Wolff; Jacques Schrenzel; Antoine Andremont; Raymond Ruimy
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  The Significance of Sodium Chloride in Studies of Staphylococci.

Authors:  G H Chapman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1945-08       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Emergence of multiresistant variants of the community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage ST1-SCCmecIV in 2 hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Cícera Silva-Carvalho; Raquel Regina Bonelli; Raquel Rodrigues Souza; Simone Moreira; Lia Cristina Galvão dos Santos; Magda de Souza Conceição; Silvio José de Mello Junior; Jupira Miron Carballido; Priscila Nobrega Rito; Verônica Viana Vieira; Lenise Arneiro Teixeira; Agnes Marie Sá Figueiredo
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Origin and molecular evolution of the determinant of methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  Sae Tsubakishita; Kyoko Kuwahara-Arai; Takashi Sasaki; Keiichi Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains of Staphylococcus sciuri in the Indonesian population.

Authors:  J A Severin; E S Lestari; K Kuntaman; M Pastink; S V Snijders; N Lemmens-den Toom; D Horst-Kreft; U Hadi; D O Duerink; W H Goessens; A C Fluit; W van Wamel; A van Belkum; H A Verbrugh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene.

Authors:  O G Brakstad; K Aasbakk; J A Maeland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Identification of Staphylococcus aureus: DNase and Mannitol salt agar improve the efficiency of the tube coagulase test.

Authors:  David P Kateete; Cyrus N Kimani; Fred A Katabazi; Alfred Okeng; Moses S Okee; Ann Nanteza; Moses L Joloba; Florence C Najjuka
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 10.  Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era.

Authors:  Henry F Chambers; Frank R Deleo
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.633

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of HiaureusTM Coagulase Confirmation Kit in Identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Arunagiri Subramanian; Vidushi K Chitalia; Kushminda Bangera; Shashikant P Vaidya; Rajas Warke; Abhay Chowdhary; Ranjana A Deshmukh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Emerging vancomycin-non susceptible coagulase negative Staphylococci associated with skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Paul A Akinduti; Yemisi Dorcas Obafemi; Harriet Ugboko; Maged El-Ashker; Olayemi Akinnola; Chioma Jane Agunsoye; Abiola Oladotun; Bruno S J Phiri; Solomon U Oranusi
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.