| Literature DB >> 26273224 |
Rafael S Vargas1, Renata Bataiolli2, Pedro B da Costa1, Bruno Lisboa3, Luciane Maria P Passaglia1, Anelise Beneduzi3, Luciano K Vargas3.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different grazing pressures on the activity and diversity of soil bacteria. We performed a long-term experiment in Eldorado do Sul, southern Brazil, that assessed three levels of grazing pressure: high pressure (HP), with 4% herbage allowance (HA), moderate pressure (MP), with 12% HA, and low pressure (LP), with 16% HA. Two reference areas were also assessed, one of never-grazed native vegetation (NG) and another of regenerated vegetation after two years of grazing (RG). Soil samples were evaluated for microbial biomass and enzymatic (β-glucosidase, arylsulfatase and urease) activities. The structure of the bacterial community and the population of diazotrophic bacteria were evaluated by RFLP of the 16S rRNA and nifH genes, respectively. The diversity of diazotrophic bacteria was assessed by partial sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene. The presence of grazing animals increased soil microbial biomass in MP and HP. The structures of the bacterial community and the populations of diazotrophic bacteria were altered by the different grazing managements, with a greater diversity of diazotrophic bacteria in the LP treatment. Based on the characteristics evaluated, the MP treatment was the most appropriate for animal production and conservation of the Pampa biome.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial diversity; diazotrophic bacteria; diversity; grasslands; soil microbial communities
Year: 2015 PMID: 26273224 PMCID: PMC4530647 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-475738138120140230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Soil chemical properties under different grazing pressures.
| Sample | Clay (%) | OM (%) | pH (H2O) | Pexc(mg/dm3) | Kexc(mg/dm3) | Alexc(Cmolc/dm3) | Caexc(Cmolc/dm3) | Mgexc(Cmolc/dm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NG | 21 | 1.9 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 104 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| RG | 30 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 128 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| LP | 28 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 1.4 | 138 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| MP | 19 | 3.6 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 79 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
| HP | 22 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 75 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
Exc - exchangeable, HP - high grazing pressure, LP - low grazing pressure, MP -moderate grazing pressure, NG - never-grazed native vegetation, OM -organic matter content, RG - regenerated vegetation.
Biochemical characteristics of the soil under different grazing pressures.
| Sample | Microbial biomass (mg kg−1) | Arylsulfatase (mg ρ-nitrophenol kg soil−1h−1) | β-Glucosidase (mg ρ-nitrophenol kg soil−1h−1) | Urease (mg NH4 + kg soil−1h−1) | GMba |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NG | 165b | 12.9c | 3.1b | 29.4b | 21.0b |
| RG | 255a | 20.2a | 5.0a | 21.2b | 27.2b |
| LP | 191b | 16.3b | 3.4b | 31.1b | 23.9b |
| MP | 249a | 21.6a | 6.9a | 31.1b | 32.7a |
| HP | 250a | 16.2b | 5.0a | 46.7a | 31.1a |
Means in the same column followed by the same letter do not differ from each other by the Scott-Knott test at p < 0.05. GMba - geometric mean of the biochemical characteristics, HP - high grazing pressure, LP - low grazing pressure, MP - moderate grazing pressure, NG - never-grazed native vegetation, RG - regenerated vegetation.
Figure 1Dendrograms generated from RFLP profiles of the 16S rDNA (A) and nifH (B) genes from DNA isolated from soil under different grazing intensities. HP - high grazing pressure, LP - low grazing pressure, MP - moderate grazing pressure, NG - never-grazed native vegetation, RG - regenerated vegetation.
Diversity of diazotrophic bacteria in soil under different grazing pressures.
| Taxa | Sample | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| NG | RG | LP | MP | HP | Total | |
|
| ||||||
| Number of individuals | ||||||
|
| - | 2 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
| 6 | 10 | 6 | 13 | 15 | 50 |
|
| 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 26 |
|
| 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
|
| - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 |
|
| - | - | 3 | - | - | 3 |
|
| 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 |
|
| - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 3 |
|
| 4 | - | - | - | - | 4 |
|
| - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
| Uncultured Enterobacteriaceae | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | 3 |
| Uncultured | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 |
| Unidentified | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 2 |
| Total | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 100 |
| Diversity index | ||||||
|
| 1.5 | 1.37 | 1.82 | 0.93 | 0.69 | |
|
| 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.60 | |
|
| 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.63 | |
D - dominance, J - equitability,H’ - Shannon diversity index, HP - high grazing pressure, LP - low grazing pressure, MP - moderate grazing pressure, NG - never-grazed native vegetation, RG - regenerated vegetation.
Figure 2Principal component analysis of the chemical, biochemical and microbiological characteristics of soil under different grazing intensities. AS - arylsulfatase, βG - β-glucosidase, HP - high grazing pressure, LP -low grazing pressure, MB - microbial biomass, MP - moderate grazing pressure, NG - never-grazed native vegetation, RG - regenerated vegetation, Ur - urease.