BACKGROUND AND AIMS: On-demand insufflation during endoscopic peritoneoscopy causes wide variations in intra-abdominal pressure. Its effects on splanchnic microcirculation may differ from those of steady intra-abdominal pressure, because pressure characteristics affect crucial intravascular hemodynamic forces--pressure and shear--adapting flow to local metabolic needs. Our aim was to assess the effect of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy on splanchnic microcirculatory blood flow. METHODS: Twenty-one swine were randomized to the following: cholecystectomy by transgastric NOTES (n = 8), cholecystectomy by standard laparoscopy (Lap) (n = 8), and a sham group (n = 5). During NOTES, CO2 was manually insufflated with a maximum allowed pressure of 30 mm Hg. In the Lap group, intra-abdominal pressure was maintained at 14 mm Hg. Systemic hemodynamics were measured, and microcirculatory blood flow was quantified by using colored microspheres. RESULTS: Mean intra-abdominal pressure was lower in NOTES than in the Lap group (P = .038). In both groups, cardiac index and preload remained unchanged, whereas systemic vascular resistances increased over time, with a lesser increase in the Lap group (2-way analysis of variance; P = .041). In pneumoperitoneum groups, microcirculatory blood flow decreased similarly in the renal medulla, stomach, small bowel, colon, and mesocolon by 30%, 45%, 34%, 32%, and 37%, respectively. In NOTES, there was a greater microcirculatory blood flow decrease in the renal cortex (NOTES 41% vs Lap 35%; P = .044) and mesentery (NOTES 44% vs Lap 38%; P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that both types of pneumoperitoneum have similar physiologic effects on microcirculatory blood flow. However, on-demand pneumoperitoneum (NOTES group) caused a greater microcirculatory blood flow decrease in areas with low metabolic needs, redistributing blood flow toward metabolically active areas.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: On-demand insufflation during endoscopic peritoneoscopy causes wide variations in intra-abdominal pressure. Its effects on splanchnic microcirculation may differ from those of steady intra-abdominal pressure, because pressure characteristics affect crucial intravascular hemodynamic forces--pressure and shear--adapting flow to local metabolic needs. Our aim was to assess the effect of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy on splanchnic microcirculatory blood flow. METHODS: Twenty-one swine were randomized to the following: cholecystectomy by transgastric NOTES (n = 8), cholecystectomy by standard laparoscopy (Lap) (n = 8), and a sham group (n = 5). During NOTES, CO2 was manually insufflated with a maximum allowed pressure of 30 mm Hg. In the Lap group, intra-abdominal pressure was maintained at 14 mm Hg. Systemic hemodynamics were measured, and microcirculatory blood flow was quantified by using colored microspheres. RESULTS: Mean intra-abdominal pressure was lower in NOTES than in the Lap group (P = .038). In both groups, cardiac index and preload remained unchanged, whereas systemic vascular resistances increased over time, with a lesser increase in the Lap group (2-way analysis of variance; P = .041). In pneumoperitoneum groups, microcirculatory blood flow decreased similarly in the renal medulla, stomach, small bowel, colon, and mesocolon by 30%, 45%, 34%, 32%, and 37%, respectively. In NOTES, there was a greater microcirculatory blood flow decrease in the renal cortex (NOTES 41% vs Lap 35%; P = .044) and mesentery (NOTES 44% vs Lap 38%; P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that both types of pneumoperitoneum have similar physiologic effects on microcirculatory blood flow. However, on-demand pneumoperitoneum (NOTES group) caused a greater microcirculatory blood flow decrease in areas with low metabolic needs, redistributing blood flow toward metabolically active areas.
Authors: J F Kuebler; N Schukfeh; G Vieten; W A Osthaus; D Huber; N Dennhard; R Suempelmann; B M Ure; M L Metzelder Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 4.584