Alexander Jahnke1, Sandra Engl2, Jörn Bengt Seeger3,2, Erhan Basad4, Markus Rickert3,2, Bernd Alexander Ishaque5,6. 1. Laboratory of Biomechanics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Paul-Meimberg-Strasse 3, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Alexander.Jahnke@ortho.med.uni-giessen.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg (UKGM), Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. 3. Laboratory of Biomechanics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Paul-Meimberg-Strasse 3, 35392, Giessen, Germany. 4. ATOS Clinic, Center for Knee and Hip Replacement and Regenerative Joint Surgery, Bismarckstrasse 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Laboratory of Biomechanics, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Paul-Meimberg-Strasse 3, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Bernd.Ishaque@ortho.med.uni-giessen.de. 6. Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg (UKGM), Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Bernd.Ishaque@ortho.med.uni-giessen.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study consisted in examining the effects of fit and fill ratio of the Metha prosthesis (BBraun, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) on radiological and clinical outcomes at a follow-up of 1 year. METHODS: 40 patients were included. Fit and fill ratio measurements, radiological and clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Correlations were established between fit and fill ratio, and potential factors like sex, age, body mass index, Harris Hip Score and changes of radiological signs. RESULTS: The whole cohort (100%) had a tight fit and fill ratio (>0.8) at the proximal level and at each follow-up. "Champagne-flute" configuration provoked high distal tight-fit and fill ratio. Poor distal fit and fill ratio compared to the proximal and the mid-stem level was measurable at each follow-up (p < 0.05). Correlations between fit and fill ratio and preoperative femur configurations were detectable. CONCLUSIONS: Implanting the Metha prosthesis induces tight fit and fill ratio at the proximal and coated sections. Preoperative femur configuration should be considered to achieve best fit and fill situation and therefore excellent primary stability. In most cases "normal" and "stove-pipe" configurations provide good proximal fit and fill. Since "champagne-flute" configuration induces undesirable tight distal fit and fill ratio the size of the Metha (®) stem should be adequately increased to achieve a more proximal load transmission.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study consisted in examining the effects of fit and fill ratio of the Metha prosthesis (BBraun, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) on radiological and clinical outcomes at a follow-up of 1 year. METHODS: 40 patients were included. Fit and fill ratio measurements, radiological and clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Correlations were established between fit and fill ratio, and potential factors like sex, age, body mass index, Harris Hip Score and changes of radiological signs. RESULTS: The whole cohort (100%) had a tight fit and fill ratio (>0.8) at the proximal level and at each follow-up. "Champagne-flute" configuration provoked high distal tight-fit and fill ratio. Poor distal fit and fill ratio compared to the proximal and the mid-stem level was measurable at each follow-up (p < 0.05). Correlations between fit and fill ratio and preoperative femur configurations were detectable. CONCLUSIONS: Implanting the Metha prosthesis induces tight fit and fill ratio at the proximal and coated sections. Preoperative femur configuration should be considered to achieve best fit and fill situation and therefore excellent primary stability. In most cases "normal" and "stove-pipe" configurations provide good proximal fit and fill. Since "champagne-flute" configuration induces undesirable tight distal fit and fill ratio the size of the Metha (®) stem should be adequately increased to achieve a more proximal load transmission.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fit and fill; Preoperative femur configuration; Short stem; THA
Authors: Laura Augustin; Sarah Boller; Cathrein Bobach; Alexander Jahnke; Gafar Adam Ahmed; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Jana Hornová; Pavel Růžička; Maroš Hrubina; Eduard Šťastný; Andrea Košková; Petr Fulín; Jiří Gallo; Matej Daniel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dietmar Dammerer; Philipp Blum; David Putzer; Dietmar Krappinger; Michael C Liebensteiner; Michael Nogler; Martin Thaler Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 2.928