Literature DB >> 26272014

Can 360-Degree Reviews Help Surgeons? Evaluation of Multisource Feedback for Surgeons in a Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement Project.

Suliat M Nurudeen1, Gifty Kwakye2, William R Berry1, Elliot L Chaikof3, Keith D Lillemoe4, Frederick Millham5, Marc Rubin6, Steven Schwaitzberg7, Robert C Shamberger8, Michael J Zinner9, Luke Sato10, Stuart Lipsitz1, Atul A Gawande1, Alex B Haynes11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical organizations have increased interest in identifying and improving behaviors that threaten team performance and patient safety. Three hundred and sixty degree evaluations of surgeons were performed at 8 academically affiliated hospitals with a common Code of Excellence. We evaluate participant perceptions and make recommendations for future use. STUDY
DESIGN: Three hundred and eighty-five surgeons in a variety of specialties underwent 360-degree evaluations, with a median of 29 reviewers each (interquartile range 23 to 36). Beginning 6 months after evaluation, surgeons, department heads, and reviewers completed follow-up surveys evaluating accuracy of feedback, willingness to participate in repeat evaluations, and behavior change.
RESULTS: Survey response rate was 31% for surgeons (118 of 385), 59% for department heads (10 of 17), and 36% for reviewers (1,042 of 2,928). Eighty-seven percent of surgeons (95% CI, 75%-94%) agreed that reviewers provided accurate feedback. Similarly, 80% of department heads believed the feedback accurately reflected performance of surgeons within their department. Sixty percent of surgeon respondents (95% CI, 49%-75%) reported making changes to their practice based on feedback received. Seventy percent of reviewers (95% CI, 69%-74%) believed the evaluation process was valuable, with 82% (95% CI, 79%-84%) willing to participate in future 360-degree reviews. Thirty-two percent of reviewers (95% CI, 29%-35%) reported perceiving behavior change in surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: Three hundred and sixty degree evaluations can provide a practical, systematic, and subjectively accurate assessment of surgeon performance without undue reviewer burden. The process was found to result in beneficial behavior change, according to surgeons and their coworkers.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26272014     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

1.  Use of Multisource Feedback to Improve Interdisciplinary Care Among Oncologists.

Authors:  Kristen A Catherman; Carl Grey; Malcolm D Mattes
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  On Patient Safety: Being a Jerk in the Operating Room is Bad for the Patient.

Authors:  Michael J Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Leadership development in a professional medical society using 360-degree survey feedback to assess emotional intelligence.

Authors:  Paul J Gregory; Benjamin Robbins; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Larry Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The Desired Concept Maps and Goal Setting for Assessing Professionalism in Medicine.

Authors:  Salman Y Guraya; Shaista S Guraya; Nehal Anam Mahabbat; Khulood Yahya Fallatah; Bashaer Ahmad Al-Ahmadi; Hadeel Hadi Alalawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

5.  Leadership-Specific Feedback Practices in Surgical Residency: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Calista M Harbaugh; Ana C De Roo; Ben E Biesterveld; Paul G Gauger; Justin B Dimick; Gurjit Sandhu
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 6.  The impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Baines; Sam Regan de Bere; Sebastian Stevens; Jamie Read; Martin Marshall; Mirza Lalani; Marie Bryce; Julian Archer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.