Alexander Wolkow1,2, Brad Aisbett3,4, John Reynolds5, Sally A Ferguson4,6, Luana C Main3. 1. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (C-PAN), Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia. awolkow@deakin.edu.au. 2. Bushfire Co-Operative Research Centre, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia. awolkow@deakin.edu.au. 3. Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (C-PAN), Deakin University, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia. 4. Bushfire Co-Operative Research Centre, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia. 5. Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, 3125, Australia. 6. Appleton Institute, CQUniversity, Wayville, 5034, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Physical work and sleep restriction are two stressors faced by firefighters, yet the combined impact these demands have on firefighters' acute stress responses is poorly understood. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect firefighting work and sleep restriction have on firefighters' acute cortisol and heart rate (HR) responses during a simulated 3-day and 2-night fire-ground deployment. METHODS: Firefighters completed multiple days of simulated physical work separated by either an 8-h (control condition; n = 18) or 4-h sleep opportunity (sleep restriction condition; n = 17). Salivary cortisol was sampled every 2 h, and HR was measured continuously each day. RESULTS: On day 2 and day 3 of the deployment, the sleep restriction condition exhibited a significantly higher daily area under the curve cortisol level and an elevated cortisol profile in the afternoon and evening when compared with the control condition. Firefighters' HR decreased across the simulation, but there were no significant differences found between conditions. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the protective role an 8-h sleep opportunity between shifts of firefighting work has on preserving normal cortisol levels when compared to a 4-h sleep opportunity which resulted in elevated afternoon and evening cortisol. Given the adverse health outcomes associated with chronically high cortisol, especially later in the day, future research should examine how prolonged exposure to firefighting work (including restricted sleep) affects firefighters' cortisol levels long term. Furthermore, monitoring cortisol levels post-deployment will determine the minimum recovery time firefighters need to safely return to the fire-ground.
PURPOSE: Physical work and sleep restriction are two stressors faced by firefighters, yet the combined impact these demands have on firefighters' acute stress responses is poorly understood. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect firefighting work and sleep restriction have on firefighters' acute cortisol and heart rate (HR) responses during a simulated 3-day and 2-night fire-ground deployment. METHODS: Firefighters completed multiple days of simulated physical work separated by either an 8-h (control condition; n = 18) or 4-h sleep opportunity (sleep restriction condition; n = 17). Salivary cortisol was sampled every 2 h, and HR was measured continuously each day. RESULTS: On day 2 and day 3 of the deployment, the sleep restriction condition exhibited a significantly higher daily area under the curve cortisol level and an elevated cortisol profile in the afternoon and evening when compared with the control condition. Firefighters' HR decreased across the simulation, but there were no significant differences found between conditions. CONCLUSION: Findings highlight the protective role an 8-h sleep opportunity between shifts of firefighting work has on preserving normal cortisol levels when compared to a 4-h sleep opportunity which resulted in elevated afternoon and evening cortisol. Given the adverse health outcomes associated with chronically high cortisol, especially later in the day, future research should examine how prolonged exposure to firefighting work (including restricted sleep) affects firefighters' cortisol levels long term. Furthermore, monitoring cortisol levels post-deployment will determine the minimum recovery time firefighters need to safely return to the fire-ground.
Authors: William R Lovallo; Thomas L Whitsett; Mustafa al'Absi; Bong Hee Sung; Andrea S Vincent; Michael F Wilson Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: T O Harris; S Borsanyi; S Messari; K Stanford; S E Cleary; H M Shiers; G W Brown; J Herbert Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Brent C Ruby; Tim C Shriver; Theodore W Zderic; Brian J Sharkey; Catherine Burks; Sonja Tysk Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: A S DeSantis; A V DiezRoux; A Hajat; A E Aiello; S H Golden; N S Jenny; T E Seeman; S Shea Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Hans K Meier-Ewert; Paul M Ridker; Nader Rifai; Meredith M Regan; Nick J Price; David F Dinges; Janet M Mullington Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-02-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Slobodanka Pejovic; Maria Basta; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Ilia Kritikou; Michele L Shaffer; Marina Tsaoussoglou; David Stiffler; Zacharias Stefanakis; Edward O Bixler; George P Chrousos Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Charlotte C Gupta; Sally A Ferguson; Brad Aisbett; Michelle Dominiak; Stephanie E Chappel; Madeline Sprajcer; Hugh H K Fullagar; Saman Khalesi; Joshua H Guy; Grace E Vincent Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Zachary McGillis; Sandra C Dorman; Ayden Robertson; Michel Larivière; Caleb Leduc; Tammy Eger; Bruce E Oddson; Céline Larivière Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 2.162