| Literature DB >> 26271000 |
Priscila Zacarias de Azevedo1, Tatiane Fernanda Sylvestre1, Ricardo de Souza Cavalcante1, Lídia Raquel de Carvalho2, Daniela Vanessa Moris3, Maria Luiza Cotrim Sartor de Oliveira4, Rinaldo Poncio Mendes1.
Abstract
The diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) depends on the radiologic image and the identification of specific antibodies. The present study aimed to evaluate accuracy parameters of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and of the determination of serum galactomannan level in the diagnosis of patients with CPA, comparing these results with the double agar gel immunodiffusion (DID) test. In addition, the prevalence of cross-reactivity and the serological progression after treatment were evaluated by comparing DID and ELISA. Six study groups were formed: G1: 22 patients with CPA, 17 of whom had Aspergillus fungus ball, one chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis (CCPA) and four chronic fibrosing pulmonary aspergillosis (CFPA); G2: 28 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB); G3: 23 patients with histoplasmosis (HST); G4: 50 patients with paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM); G5: 20 patients with cryptococcosis (CRC); and G6: 200 healthy controls. Serum antibodies were measured by DID and ELISA, with two antigen preparations--Aspergillus fumigatus (DID1, ELISA1) and a pool of A. fumigatus, A. flavus and A. niger antigens (DID2, ELISA2). The Platélia Aspergillus Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) kit was used to measure galactomannan. The cut-off points of ELISA were determined for each antigen preparation and for the 95% and 99% confidence intervals. Despite the low sensitivity, DID was the technique of choice due to its specificity, positive and negative predictive values and positive likelihood ratio-especially with the antigen pool and due to the low frequency of cross-reactivity. ELISA1 and a 0.090 cut-off showed high sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value, but a high frequency of cross-reactivity with CRC. The best degree of agreement was observed between ELISA1 and ELISA2. The detection of serum galactomannan showed high sensitivity, comparable to ELISA2. The immunodiffusion test showed an excellent relationship with the progression after treatment, which made it the reaction of choice for patient follow-up.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26271000 PMCID: PMC4536220 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characterization of the 25 evaluated patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.
|
| Median = 55 (33–80) | |||
|
| Male = 20 (80%) | Female = 5 (20%) | ||
|
| TB = 19 (76%) | PCM = 2 (8%) | Pneummonia = 1 (4%) | not specified = 3 (12%) |
|
| ||||
| Weight loss = 72,7% | Expectoration = 50,0% | Cough = 77,3% | ||
| Fever = 27,3% | Dyspnea = 50,0% | Haemoptysis = 63,6% | ||
| Chest pain = 22,7% | ||||
|
| BF = 20 (80%) F = 4 (16%) C = 1 (4%) | |||
|
| 4/14 = 28,6% | |||
|
| 7/12 = 58,3% | |||
|
| 13/20 = 65% | |||
|
| BT = 7/ 23 (30,4%) | ESL = 4/23 (17,4%) | ||
|
| ITZ = 17/19 (89,5%) | AMB = 3/19 (15,8%) | VCZ = 1/19 (5,3%) | |
TB: tuberculosis; PCM: paracoccidioidomycosis; CT: computed tomography; DID: double agar gel immunodiffusion test; TB: transbronchial biopsy; RSL: resection segment or lobe; ITZ: itraconazole; AMB: amphotericin B; VCZ: voriconazole.
Fig 1Receiver operator characteristic curve obtained for determining the cut-off point of the serum level of anti-Aspergillus antibodies, using A. fumigatus antigen (A) and A. fumigatus, A. flavus and A. niger antigen pool (B), based on 22 patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and 200 healthy blood donors from the same region.
Accuracy parameters of immunodiffusion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests.
| Serological tests | S (%) | E (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | PLR (CPRL) | NLR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DID 1 | 45,5 | 100,0 | 100,0 | 93,3 | 90,9 | 0,5 |
| DID 2 | 59,1 | 100,0 | 100,0 | 95,7 | 118,2 | 0,4 |
| ELISA 1 (0,120) | 81,8 | 94,0 | 60,0 | 97,9 | 13,6 | 0,2 |
| ELISA 1 (0,130) | 72,7 | 97,0 | 76,2 | 97,0 | 29,1 | 0,3 |
| ELISA 2 (0,090) | 86,4 | 96,5 | 73,1 | 98,5 | 24,7 | 0,1 |
| ELISA 2 (0,100) | 59,1 | 99,5 | 92,9 | 95,7 | 118,2 | 0,4 |
DID:double agar gel immunodiffusion; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; 1: antigen the Aspergillus fumigatus; 2: pool de antigens the A. fumigatus, A. flavus e A. niger; 0,120, 0,130, 0,090 e 0,100 –cut-off values; S: sensitivity, E: specificity; PPV / NPV: positive and negative predictive values; PLR: positive likelihood ratio; CPRL: corrected positive likelihood ratio; NLR: negative likelihood ratio. Subjects: 22 patients with chronic aspergillosis and 200 healthy controls.
Prevalence (percentage) of cross-reactions observed in immunodiffusion and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests.
| Disease | Patient number | DID 1 | DID 2 | ELISA 1 (0,120) | ELISA 1 (0,130) | ELISA 2 (0,090) | ELISA 2 (0,100) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 28 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 21,4 | 10,7 | 10,7 | 0,0 |
|
| [0,121–0,128] | [0,138–0,156] | [0,093–0,099] | ||||
|
| 23 | 0,0 | 8,7 | 30,4 | 8,7 | 21,7 | 13,0 |
|
| [undiluted—1/4] | [0,120–0,128] | [0,132–0,138] | [0,091–0,094] | [0,103–0,115] | ||
|
| 50 | 2,0 | 0,0 | 40,0 | 36,0 | 62,0 | 52,0 |
|
| [undiluted] | [0,120–0,128] | [0,131–0,181] | [0,091–0,097] | [0,101–0,140] | ||
|
| 20 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 0,0 | 20,0 | 0,0 |
|
| [0,091–0,098] |
DID: double agar gel immunodiffusion test; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; 1: antigen of Aspergillus fumigatus; 2: pool of antigens: A. fumigatus, A. flavus e A. niger, () cut-off the test; TBC: tuberculosis; HST: histoplasmosis; PCM: paracoccidioidomycosis; CRC: cryptococcosis; [] range.
Qualitative results of serological tests performed in 16 patients with chronic aspergillosis.
Comparisons carried out among the double agar gel immunodiffusion test (DID) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using two antigenic preparations, and galactomannan (GM). Comparisons performed by Cochran Q test, McNemar test, and the bionomial test.
| Number of order | Patient number | DID | DID | ELISA | ELISA | GM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| - | - | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | + | + | + | - |
|
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| - | - | - | - | + |
|
|
| - | - | - | - | + |
|
|
| + | + | - | + | + |
|
|
| - | + | + | + | - |
|
|
| - | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| - | - | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | - | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | - | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
| - | - | + | + | + |
|
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- no reagent; +: reagent.
1-Aspergillus fumigatus antigen
2-Pool of antigens from Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus
Q = 119.34 (p<0.00001)
DID1 vs DID2: p = 0.36; DID1 vs ELISA1: p = 0.11; DID1 vs ELISA2: p = 0.03; DID1 vs GM: p = 0.06
DID2 vs ELISA1: p = 0.11; DID2 vs ELISA2: p = 0.03; DID2 vs GM: p = 0.09; ELISA1 vs ELISA2: p = 0.50; ELISA1 vs GM: p = 0.50; ELISA2 vs GM: p = 0.36
Frequencies followed by the same letter do not differ (p>0.05); frequencies followed by different letters are statistically different (p≤0.05) presented a tendency a statistical difference (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10).
Degree of agreement of diagnosis tests in 22 patients with chonic aspergillosis.
Comparison 2x2 using the kappa test.
| Paired tests (A | Patients (number) | Kappa statistic | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | A+B+ | A-B- | A+B- | A-B+ | Value | Confidence interval 95% | Strength of agreement | |
|
| 22 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0.37 | [0.00–0.76] | fair |
|
| 22 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0.14 | [0.00–0.53] | slight |
|
| 22 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0.23 | [0.00–0.62] | fair |
|
| 16 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.03 | [0.00–0.57] | slight |
|
| 22 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0.28 | [0.00–0.72] | fair |
|
| 22 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0.16 | [0.00–0,63] | slight |
|
| 16 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0.00 | [0.00–0.30] | slight |
|
| 22 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.49 | [0.00–1.00] | moderate |
|
| 16 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.00 | [0.00–0.68] | slight |
|
| 16 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | [0.00–0.83] | slight |
DID: Double agar gel immunodiffusion test; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GM: Galactomannan
1-Aspergillus fumigatus antigen
2-Pool of antigens from Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus
Fig 2Regression analysis representing changes in serum levels of anti-Aspergillus antibodies as a function of the antifungal treatment period in 10 patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.
(A) Curve representing the progression of serum levels determined by DID test with the A. fumigatus antigen and Aspergillus spp. antigen pool. (B) Curve representing the progression of serum levels determined by ELISA using A. fumigatus antigen and Aspergillus spp. antigen pool.
Progress of 10 patients after treatment, as to age and clinical, roentnologic, and global outcome.
| Case number | Age (years) | Treatment lenght (months) | Clinical outcome | Roentnologic outcome | Global outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51 | 9 | Clinical improvement | Persistence of aspergilloma | Died |
| 2 | 57 | 61 | Clinical cure | Persistence of aspergilloma | Alive |
| 3 | 55 | 86 | Clinical cure | Aspergilloma disappeared | Alive |
| 4 | 43 | 12 | Clinical cure | Fibrotic scars | Alive |
| 5 | 74 | 49 | Clinical cure | Aspergilloma disappeared | Alive |
| 6 | 67 | 17 | Clinical cure | Aspergilloma disappeared | Alive |
| 7 | 44 | 12 | Clinical cure | Persistence of aspergilloma | Alive |
| 8 | 80 | 2 | Clinical improvement | Persistence of aspergilloma | Died |
| 9 | 33 | 3,5 | Clinical cure | Aspergilloma disappeared | Alive |
| 10 | 76 | 8,5 | Clinical improvement | Fibrotic scars | Died |
Fig 3Regression analyses showing the decreasing antibody serum levels anti-Aspergillus, and evident clinical improvement after introduction of antifungal treatment.
The regression curves are different.