Matthew Toth1, Mark Holmes, Courtney Van Houtven, Mark Toles, Morris Weinberger, Pam Silberman. 1. *Department of Health Policy and Management, Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill †US Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham VA Medical Center, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care ‡Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham §School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospitals are focused on improving postdischarge services for older adults, such as early follow-up care after hospitalization to reduce readmissions and unnecessary emergency department (ED) use. Rural Medicare beneficiaries face many barriers to receiving quality care, but little is known about their postdischarge care and outcomes. We hypothesize that rural Medicare beneficiaries compared with urban beneficiaries, will have fewer follow-up visits, and a greater likelihood of readmission and ED use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of elderly Medicare beneficiaries discharged home using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Cost and Use files, 2000-2010. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk of rural residency on readmission, ED use, and follow-up care up to 30 days' postdischarge. Covariates include demographic, health, and hospital-level characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with urban beneficiaries, Medicare beneficiaries living in isolated rural settings had a lower rate of follow-up care [hazard ratio (HR)=0.81, P<0.001]. Beneficiaries in large and small rural settings had a greater risk of an ED visit compared with urban beneficiaries (HR=1.44, P<0.001; HR=1.52, P<0.01). Rural beneficiaries did not have a greater risk of readmission, though risk of readmission was higher for beneficiaries discharged from hospitals in large and small rural settings (HR=1.33, P<0.05; HR=1.42, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of lower quality postdischarge care for Medicare beneficiaries in rural settings. As readmission penalties expand, hospitals serving rural beneficiaries may be disproportionately affected. This suggests a need for policies that increase follow-up care in rural settings.
BACKGROUND: Hospitals are focused on improving postdischarge services for older adults, such as early follow-up care after hospitalization to reduce readmissions and unnecessary emergency department (ED) use. Rural Medicare beneficiaries face many barriers to receiving quality care, but little is known about their postdischarge care and outcomes. We hypothesize that rural Medicare beneficiaries compared with urban beneficiaries, will have fewer follow-up visits, and a greater likelihood of readmission and ED use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of elderly Medicare beneficiaries discharged home using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, Cost and Use files, 2000-2010. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk of rural residency on readmission, ED use, and follow-up care up to 30 days' postdischarge. Covariates include demographic, health, and hospital-level characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with urban beneficiaries, Medicare beneficiaries living in isolated rural settings had a lower rate of follow-up care [hazard ratio (HR)=0.81, P<0.001]. Beneficiaries in large and small rural settings had a greater risk of an ED visit compared with urban beneficiaries (HR=1.44, P<0.001; HR=1.52, P<0.01). Rural beneficiaries did not have a greater risk of readmission, though risk of readmission was higher for beneficiaries discharged from hospitals in large and small rural settings (HR=1.33, P<0.05; HR=1.42, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of lower quality postdischarge care for Medicare beneficiaries in rural settings. As readmission penalties expand, hospitals serving rural beneficiaries may be disproportionately affected. This suggests a need for policies that increase follow-up care in rural settings.
Authors: Matthew Toth; Mark Holmes; Courtney Van Houtven; Mark Toles; Morris Weinberger; Pam Silberman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Kevin N Griffith; David A Schwartzman; Steven D Pizer; Jacob Bor; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Brian Jack; Melissa M Garrido Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 9.048
Authors: Piper H Williams; Heather M Gilmartin; Chelsea Leonard; Michaela S McCarthy; Lynette Kelley; Gary K Grunwald; Christine D Jones; Melanie D Whittington Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Stephen D Zoller; Kristin A Toy; Peter Wang; Edward Ebramzadeh; Richard E Bowen Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Claire E O'Hanlon; Ashley M Kranz; Maria DeYoreo; Ammarah Mahmud; Cheryl L Damberg; Justin Timbie Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; Maureen E Canavan; Margaret B Greenwood-Ericksen; Vivek L Parwani; Andrew S Ulrich; Randy L Pilgrim; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 6.762