Literature DB >> 26270694

Electromyographical and Perceptual Responses to Different Resistance Intensities in a Squat Protocol: Does Performing Sets to Failure With Light Loads Produce the Same Activity?

David P Looney1, William J Kraemer, Michael F Joseph, Brett A Comstock, Craig R Denegar, Shawn D Flanagan, Robert U Newton, Tunde K Szivak, William H DuPont, David R Hooper, Keijo Häkkinen, Carl M Maresh.   

Abstract

This investigation examined peak motor unit activity during sets that differed in resistance (50, 70, or 90% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]). Ten resistance-trained men (age, 23 ± 3 years; height, 187 ± 7 cm; body mass, 91.5 ± 6.9 kg; squat 1RM, 141 ± 28 kg) were assessed by electromyography (EMG) on the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles in a randomized within-subject experiment consisting of 2 test visits: a drop-set day and a single-set day using only the 50% of 1RM intensity performed to failure. At the start of each day, subjects performed 2 submaximal repetition sets (50% 1RM × 10 repetitions and 70% 1RM × 7 repetitions). On the drop-set day, subjects performed 3 consecutive maximal repetition sets at 90%, 70%, and 50% 1RM to failure with no rest periods in between. On the single-set day, subjects performed a maximal repetition set at 50% 1RM to failure. Overall, the maximal repetition sets to failure at 50% and 70% 1RM resulted in higher peak EMG amplitude than during submaximal repetition sets with the same resistance. However, peak EMG amplitude was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater in the maximal 90% 1RM set than all other sets performed. When sets were performed to failure, ratings of perceived exertion (CR-10) did not differ over the intensity range of loads and suggests that perception is not capable of accurately detecting the actual amount of motor unit activation. The results of this investigation indicate that using higher external resistance is a more effective means of increasing motor unit activity than increasing the number of repetitions performed with lighter weights even when the end point is muscular failure. Accordingly, previous recommendations for the use of heavier loads during resistance training programs to stimulate the maximal development of strength and hypertrophy are further supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26270694     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

1.  Motor unit action potential amplitude during low torque fatiguing contractions versus high torque non-fatiguing contractions: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Kylie K Harmon; Adam S Hamilton; Brent D Johnson; Frank J Bartek; Ryan M Girts; Rob J MacLennan; Debbie L Hahs-Vaughn; Matt S Stock
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Interference Phenomenon with Concurrent Strength and High-Intensity Interval Training-Based Aerobic Training: An Updated Model.

Authors:  Felipe C Vechin; Miguel S Conceição; Guilherme D Telles; Cleiton A Libardi; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  High- and Low-Load Resistance Training: Interpretation and Practical Application of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  James Fisher; James Steele; Dave Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Longing for a Longitudinal Proxy: Acutely Measured Surface EMG Amplitude is not a Validated Predictor of Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Israel Halperin; Gabriel S Trajano; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training-mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men.

Authors:  Robert W Morton; Sara Y Oikawa; Christopher G Wavell; Nicole Mazara; Chris McGlory; Joe Quadrilatero; Brittany L Baechler; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-05-12

6.  Is Resistance Training to Muscular Failure Necessary?

Authors:  Sanmy R Nóbrega; Cleiton A Libardi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Interpreting Signal Amplitudes in Surface Electromyography Studies in Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Israel Halperin; Gregory J Lehman; Gabriel S Trajano; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Effect of Barbell Weight on the Structure of the Flat Bench Press.

Authors:  Henryk Król; Artur Gołaś
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  The Effects of Varying Glenohumeral Joint Angle on Acute Volume Load, Muscle Activation, Swelling, and Echo-Intensity on the Biceps Brachii in Resistance-Trained Individuals.

Authors:  Christopher Barakat; Renato Barroso; Michael Alvarez; Jacob Rauch; Nicholas Miller; Anton Bou-Sliman; Eduardo O De Souza
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.