| Literature DB >> 26269796 |
Peter W Schreiber1, Leonardo Aceto2, Raphael Korach3, Nelson Marreros4, Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis4, Huldrych F Günthard1.
Abstract
Background. In Switzerland, leptospirosis is still considered as a travel-associated disease. After the surprising diagnosis of leptospirosis in a patient who was initially suspected as having primary human immunodeficiency virus infection, we recognized that acquisition of leptospirosis occurred through recreational activities and we identified additional affected individuals. Methods. Detailed anamnesis, excluding occupational exposure, acquisition abroad, and pet contacts, enabled us to detect the source of infection and identify a cluster of leptospirosis. Convalescent sera testing was performed to confirm Leptospira infection. Microscopic agglutination tests were used to determine the infecting serovar. Results. We identified a cluster of leptospirosis in young, previously healthy persons. Acquisition of leptospirosis was traced back to a surfing spot on a river in Switzerland (Reuss, Aargau). Clinical presentation was indistinct. Two of the 3 reported cases required hospitalization, and 1 case even suffered from meningitis. Serologic tests indicated infection with the serovar Grippotyphosa in all cases. With the exception of the case with meningitis, no antibiotics were administered, because leptospirosis was diagnosed after spontaneous resolution of most symptoms. Despite a prolonged period of convalescence in 2 cases, full recovery was achieved. Recent reports on beavers suffering from leptospirosis in this region underline the possible water-borne infection of the 3 cases and raise the question of potential wildlife reservoirs. Conclusions. Insufficient awareness of caregivers, which may be promoted by the missing obligation to report human leptospirosis, combined with the multifaceted presentation of the disease result in significant underdiagnosis. More frequent consideration of leptospirosis as differential diagnosis is inevitable, particularly as veterinary data suggest re-emergence of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: Leptospira; leptospirosis; recreational activities; water-borne; zoonosis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26269796 PMCID: PMC4531225 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofv102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis ISSN: 2328-8957 Impact factor: 3.835
Results of Leptospira Serology of Cases 1–3
| Serologic Test | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial: >100 U/mL | 84 U/mLb | Initial: 69 U/mL | |
| Initial: <10 U/mL | >100 U/mL | Initial: <10 U/mL | |
| Initial: not reactive for all tested sv | sv Grippotyphosa 1:800b | Initial: ND | |
| Initial: ND | 1:120b | Initial: ND |
Abbreviations: ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Ig, immunoglobulin; MAT, microscopic agglutination tests; ND, not done; sv, serovars.
a SERION ELISA classic assay (virion/serion, Würzburg, Germany).
b Serology only performed at second presentation.
c MAT was performed for sv Australis, Autumnalis, Ballum, Bataviae, Bratislava, Canicola, Copenhageni, Grippotyphosa, Hardjo, Hebdomadis, Javanica, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Pomona, Pyrogenes, Saxkoebing, Sejroe, and Tarassovi (dilution of 1:100 used as cutoff for all sv, only titers of reactive sv are reported in Table 1).
Figure 1.Clinical description and recommended case definition according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Abbreviations: ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Ig, immunoglobulin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.