Carolien Boeckx1, Lina Blockx1, Ken Op de Beeck2, Ridha Limame1, Guy Van Camp3, Marc Peeters4, Jan B Vermorken4, Pol Specenier4, An Wouters1, Marc Baay1, Filip Lardon1. 1. Center for Oncological Research (CORE) Antwerp, Laboratory of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, University of Antwerp Belgium. 2. Center for Oncological Research (CORE) Antwerp, Laboratory of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, University of Antwerp Belgium ; Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp Belgium. 3. Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp Belgium. 4. Center for Oncological Research (CORE) Antwerp, Laboratory of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, University of Antwerp Belgium ; Department of Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After an initial response to EGFR targeted therapy, secondary resistance almost invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of the drug. Hence, it has been recognized that the successful implementation of targeted therapy in the treatment of HNSCC cancer is very much dependent on predictive biomarkers for patient selection. METHODS: We generated an in vitro model of acquired cetuximab resistance by chronically exposing three HNSCC cell lines to increasing cetuximab doses. Gene expression profiles of sensitive parental cells and resistant daughter cells were compared using microarray analysis. Growth inhibitory experiments were performed with an HB-EGF antibody and the MMP inhibitor, both in combination with cetuximab. Characteristics of EMT were analyzed using migration and invasion assays, immunofluorescent vimentin staining and qRT-PCR for several genes involved in this process. The function of the transcription factor AP-1 was investigated using qRT-PCR for several genes upregulated or downregulated in cetuximab resistant cells. Furthermore, anchorage-independent growth was investigated using the soft agar assay. RESULTS: Gene expression profiling shows that cetuximab resistant cells upregulate several genes, including interleukin 8, the EGFR ligand HB-EGF and the metalloproteinase ADAM19. Cytotoxicity experiments with neutralizing HB-EGF antibody could not induce any growth inhibition, whereas an MMP inhibitor inhibited cell growth in cetuximab resistant cells. However, no synergetic effects combined with cetuximab could be observed. Cetuximab resistant cells showed traits of EMT, as witnessed by increased migratory potential, increased invasive potential, increased vimentine expression and increased expression of several genes involved in EMT. Furthermore, expression of upregulated genes could be repressed by the treatment with apigenin. The cetuximab resistant LICR-HN2 R10.3 cells tend to behave differently in cell culture, forming spheres. Therefore, soft agar assay was performed and showed more and larger colonies when challenged with cetuximab compared to PBS challenged cells. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our results indicate that increased expression of the ligand HB-EGF could contribute to resistance towards cetuximab in our cetuximab resistant HNSCC cells. Furthermore, several genes upregulated or downregulated in cetuximab resistant cells are under control of the AP-1 transcription factor. However, more studies are warranted to further unravel the role of AP-1 in cetuximab resistance.
BACKGROUND: After an initial response to EGFR targeted therapy, secondary resistance almost invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of the drug. Hence, it has been recognized that the successful implementation of targeted therapy in the treatment of HNSCC cancer is very much dependent on predictive biomarkers for patient selection. METHODS: We generated an in vitro model of acquired cetuximab resistance by chronically exposing three HNSCC cell lines to increasing cetuximab doses. Gene expression profiles of sensitive parental cells and resistant daughter cells were compared using microarray analysis. Growth inhibitory experiments were performed with an HB-EGF antibody and the MMP inhibitor, both in combination with cetuximab. Characteristics of EMT were analyzed using migration and invasion assays, immunofluorescent vimentin staining and qRT-PCR for several genes involved in this process. The function of the transcription factor AP-1 was investigated using qRT-PCR for several genes upregulated or downregulated in cetuximab resistant cells. Furthermore, anchorage-independent growth was investigated using the soft agar assay. RESULTS: Gene expression profiling shows that cetuximab resistant cells upregulate several genes, including interleukin 8, the EGFR ligand HB-EGF and the metalloproteinase ADAM19. Cytotoxicity experiments with neutralizing HB-EGF antibody could not induce any growth inhibition, whereas an MMP inhibitor inhibited cell growth in cetuximab resistant cells. However, no synergetic effects combined with cetuximab could be observed. Cetuximab resistant cells showed traits of EMT, as witnessed by increased migratory potential, increased invasive potential, increased vimentine expression and increased expression of several genes involved in EMT. Furthermore, expression of upregulated genes could be repressed by the treatment with apigenin. The cetuximab resistant LICR-HN2 R10.3 cells tend to behave differently in cell culture, forming spheres. Therefore, soft agar assay was performed and showed more and larger colonies when challenged with cetuximab compared to PBS challenged cells. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our results indicate that increased expression of the ligand HB-EGF could contribute to resistance towards cetuximab in our cetuximab resistant HNSCC cells. Furthermore, several genes upregulated or downregulated in cetuximab resistant cells are under control of the AP-1 transcription factor. However, more studies are warranted to further unravel the role of AP-1 in cetuximab resistance.
Entities:
Keywords:
ADAM19; HB-EGF; Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); cetuximab; interleukin 8; resistance; transcription factor AP-1
Authors: Romaine I Fernando; Marianne D Castillo; Mary Litzinger; Duane H Hamilton; Claudia Palena Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rekha Gyanchandani; Daisuke Sano; Marcus V Ortega Alves; Jonah D Klein; Beth A Knapick; Sanders Oh; Jeffrey N Myers; Seungwon Kim Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hiromitsu Hatakeyama; Haixia Cheng; Pamela Wirth; Ashley Counsell; Samuel R Marcrom; Carey Burton Wood; Paula R Pohlmann; Jill Gilbert; Barbara Murphy; Wendell G Yarbrough; Deric L Wheeler; Paul M Harari; Yan Guo; Yu Shyr; Robbert J Slebos; Christine H Chung Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbara A Frederick; Barbara A Helfrich; Christopher D Coldren; Di Zheng; Dan Chan; Paul A Bunn; David Raben Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Ahmad Zulkifli; Fiona H Tan; Zammam Areeb; Sarah F Stuart; Juliana Gomez; Lucia Paradiso; Rodney B Luwor Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Elana J Fertig; Hiroyuki Ozawa; Manjusha Thakar; Jason D Howard; Luciane T Kagohara; Gabriel Krigsfeld; Ruchira S Ranaweera; Robert M Hughes; Jimena Perez; Siân Jones; Alexander V Favorov; Jacob Carey; Genevieve Stein-O'Brien; Daria A Gaykalova; Michael F Ochs; Christine H Chung Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-11-08
Authors: Ines De Pauw; Filip Lardon; Jolien Van den Bossche; Hasan Baysal; Erik Fransen; Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Patrick Pauwels; Marc Peeters; Jan Baptist Vermorken; An Wouters Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Julie Jacobs; An Wouters; Hasan Baysal; Ines De Pauw; Hannah Zaryouh; Jorrit De Waele; Marc Peeters; Patrick Pauwels; Jan Baptist Vermorken; Evelien Smits; Filip Lardon Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 7.640