| Literature DB >> 26269616 |
Charles J Woodrow1, Chirapat Wangsing2, Kanlaya Sriprawat2, Peter R Christensen2, Francois Nosten3, Laurent Rénia4, Bruce Russell5, Benoît Malleret6.
Abstract
Flow cytometry is an objective method for conducting in vitro antimalarial sensitivity assays with increasing potential for application in field sites. We examined in vitro susceptibility to seven anti-malarial drugs for 40 fresh P. falciparum field isolates via a flow cytometry method (FCM), a colorimetric LDH-based ELISA : DELI), and standard microscopic slide analysis of growth. For FCM, 184/280 (66%) assays met analytical acceptance criteria, compared to 166/280 (59%) for DELI. There was good agreement between FCM and microscopy, while DELI tended to produce higher half-maximal inhibition constants (IC50s) than FCM, with an overall bias of 2.2-fold (Bland-Altman comparison). Values for artesunate and dihydroartemisinin were most affected. Paradoxical increases in signal at very high concentrations of mefloquine and related compounds were more marked with the DELI assay, suggesting that off-target effects on LDH production may be responsible. Loss of FCM signal due to reinvasion or slow growth was observed in a small number of samples. These results extend previous work on use of flow cytometry to determine antimalarial susceptibility in terms of the number of samples, range of drugs, and comparison with other methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26269616 PMCID: PMC4572553 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01226-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948
Geometric mean and 95% CI for seven drugs and three methods
| Drug | Microscopy | Flow cytometry | Colorimetric microtest | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean IC50 (95% CI) | Mean IC50 (95% CI) | Mean IC50 (95% CI) | ||||
| AS | 29 | 0.5459 (0.4395–0.6781) | 29 | 0.7795 (0.565–1.075) | 33 | 1.875 (1.487–2.363) |
| DHA | 33 | 1.568 (0.9877–2.488) | 28 | 2.653 (2.195–3.206) | ||
| LUM | 23 | 28.25 (17.45–45.75) | 22 | 53.89 (35.4–82.02) | ||
| MQ | 35 | 34.48 (26.34–45.15) | 21 | 36.29 (21.88–60.2) | 18 | 34.22 (19.81–59.12) |
| PIP | 26 | 9.131 (7.415–11.24) | 29 | 15.12 (13.1–17.46) | ||
| CQ | 36 | 111.2 (93.02–132.9) | 30 | 128.5 (96.55–171) | 24 | 189 (117.7–303.7) |
| QN | 22 | 239.8 (153.4–374.7) | 12 | 356.9 (214.5–594) | ||
FIG 1(A) Flow cytometry gating strategy to define schizont parasitemia after 42 h of drug exposure. The maturation of P. falciparum schizonts (shown in the gate) was compared to the drug-free condition. The y axis represents the SYBR green signal, and the x axis represents the ethidium signal. (B and C) Concentration-inhibition curves and IC50s generated with the flow cytometry (B) and DELI (C) assays.
FIG 2Bland-Altman plots for flow cytometry compared to microscopy (A) and DELI (B). Microscopic data were obtained for AS, CQ, and MQ, while flow cytometry and DELI colorimetric microtest data were obtained for all 7 drugs.
FIG 3(A) Flow cytometry data illustrating two issues with P. falciparum ex vivo sensitivity assays, reinvasion and slow parasite growth. (B) Corresponding data for the DELI colorimetric microtest for these isolates.
FIG 4(A) An example of paradoxical increase in signal with very high concentrations of mefloquine. (B) Paradoxical increased apparent growth at high drug concentrations for the seven drugs with flow cytometry (FCM) and DELI methods (see Materials and Methods for the definition and calculation of paradoxical growth).