Ya-Fen Chan1, Shou-En Lu2, Bill Howe3, Hendrik Tieben4, Theresa Hoeft5, Jürgen Unützer5. 1. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. yfcuw@uw.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA. 3. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. School of Architecture, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong. 5. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rates of substance use in rural areas are close to those of urban areas. While recent efforts have emphasized integrated care as a promising model for addressing workforce shortages in providing behavioral health services to those living in medically underserved regions, little is known on how substance use problems are addressed in rural primary care settings. OBJECTIVE: To examine rural-urban variations in screening and monitoring primary care- based patients for substance use problems in a state-wide mental health integration program. DESIGN: This was an observational study using patient registry. SUBJECTS: The study included adult enrollees (n = 15,843) with a mental disorder from 133 participating community health clinics. MAIN OUTCOMES: We measured whether a standardized substance use instrument was used to screen patients at treatment entry and to monitor symptoms at follow-up visits. KEY RESULTS: While on average 73.6 % of patients were screened for substance use, follow-up on substance use problems after initial screening was low (41.4 %); clinics in small/isolated rural settings appeared to be the lowest (13.6 %). Patients who were treated for a mental disorder or substance abuse in the past and who showed greater psychiatric complexities were more likely to receive a screening, whereas patients of small, isolated rural clinics and those traveling longer distances to the care facility were least likely to receive follow-up monitoring for their substance use problems. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the prevalent substance misuse among patients with mental disorders, opportunities to screen this high-risk population for substance use and provide a timely follow-up for those identified as at risk remained overlooked in both rural and urban areas. Rural residents continue to bear a disproportionate burden of substance use problems, with rural-urban disparities found to be most salient in providing the continuum of services for patients with substance use problems in primary care.
BACKGROUND: Rates of substance use in rural areas are close to those of urban areas. While recent efforts have emphasized integrated care as a promising model for addressing workforce shortages in providing behavioral health services to those living in medically underserved regions, little is known on how substance use problems are addressed in rural primary care settings. OBJECTIVE: To examine rural-urban variations in screening and monitoring primary care- based patients for substance use problems in a state-wide mental health integration program. DESIGN: This was an observational study using patient registry. SUBJECTS: The study included adult enrollees (n = 15,843) with a mental disorder from 133 participating community health clinics. MAIN OUTCOMES: We measured whether a standardized substance use instrument was used to screen patients at treatment entry and to monitor symptoms at follow-up visits. KEY RESULTS: While on average 73.6 % of patients were screened for substance use, follow-up on substance use problems after initial screening was low (41.4 %); clinics in small/isolated rural settings appeared to be the lowest (13.6 %). Patients who were treated for a mental disorder or substance abuse in the past and who showed greater psychiatric complexities were more likely to receive a screening, whereas patients of small, isolated rural clinics and those traveling longer distances to the care facility were least likely to receive follow-up monitoring for their substance use problems. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the prevalent substance misuse among patients with mental disorders, opportunities to screen this high-risk population for substance use and provide a timely follow-up for those identified as at risk remained overlooked in both rural and urban areas. Rural residents continue to bear a disproportionate burden of substance use problems, with rural-urban disparities found to be most salient in providing the continuum of services for patients with substance use problems in primary care.
Entities:
Keywords:
primary health care; rural–urban; substance screening and monitoring
Authors: Antoinette Krupski; Jeanne M Sears; Jutta M Joesch; Sharon Estee; Lijian He; Chris Dunn; Alice Huber; Peter Roy-Byrne; Richard Ries Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: David H Gustafson; Bret R Shaw; Andrew Isham; Timothy Baker; Michael G Boyle; Michael Levy Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Carrie B Oser; Carl G Leukefeld; Michele Staton Tindall; Thomas F Garrity; Robert G Carlson; Russel Falck; Jichuan Wang; Brenda M Booth Journal: Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol Date: 2010-05-12
Authors: Richard L Brown; Laura A Saunders; James A Bobula; Marlon P Mundt; Paul E Koch Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Dominic Hodgkin; Wenwu Gao; Elizabeth L Merrick; Charles E Drebing; Mary Jo Larson; Constance M Horgan; Monica Sharma; Nancy M Petry; Richard Saitz Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Kara M Bensley; John Fortney; Gary Chan; Julia C Dombrowski; India Ornelas; Anna D Rubinsky; Gwen T Lapham; Joseph E Glass; Emily C Williams Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Elizabeth C Saunders; Sarah K Moore; Trip Gardner; Sarah Farkas; Lisa A Marsch; Bethany McLeman; Andrea Meier; Noah Nesin; John Rotrosen; Olivia Walsh; Jennifer McNeely Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sarah K Moore; Elizabeth C Saunders; Emily Hichborn; Bethany McLeman; Andrea Meier; Robyn Young; Noah Nesin; Sarah Farkas; Leah Hamilton; Lisa A Marsch; Trip Gardner; Jennifer McNeely Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Elizabeth C Saunders; Sarah K Moore; Olivia Walsh; Stephen A Metcalf; Alan J Budney; Patricia Cavazos-Rehg; Emily Scherer; Lisa A Marsch Journal: Addict Sci Clin Pract Date: 2021-01-27