Pierpaolo Alongi1, Maria Picchio1, Fabio Zattoni2, Marianna Spallino3, Luigi Gianolli1, Giorgio Saladini4, Laura Evangelista5. 1. Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. 3. University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. 4. Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy, Gattamelata Street, 64, Padua, Italy. 5. Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy, Gattamelata Street, 64, Padua, Italy. laura.evangelista@ioveneto.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was 1) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), 2) to assess the impact of FDG PET/CT on treatment decision-making, and 3) to estimate the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in the restaging process among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: From the FDG PET/CT databases of San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy, and the Veneto Institute of Oncology in Padua, Italy, we selected 104 patients with a certain diagnosis of RCC after surgery, and for whom at least 24 months of post-surgical FDG PET/CT, clinical, and instrumental follow-up data was available. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT were assessed by histology and/or other imaging as standard of reference. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of outcome. RESULTS: FDG PET/CT resulted in a positive diagnosis in 58 patients and a negative diagnosis in 46 patients. Sensitivity and specificity were 74% and 80%, respectively. FDG PET/CT findings influenced therapeutic management in 45/104 cases (43%). After a median follow-up period of 37 months (± standard deviation 12.9), 51 (49%) patients had recurrence of disease, and 26 (25%) had died. In analysis of OS, positive versus negative FDG PET/CT was associated with worse cumulative survival rates over a 5-year period (19% vs. 69%, respectively; p <0.05). Similarly, a positive FDG PET/CT correlated with a lower 3-year PFS rate. In addition, univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that a positive scan, alone or in combination with disease stage III-IV or nuclear grading 3-4, was associated with high risk of progression (multivariate analysis = hazard ratios [HRs] of 4.01, 3.7, and 2.8, respectively; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool both in treatment decision-making and for predicting survival and progression in patients affected by RCC.
PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was 1) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), 2) to assess the impact of FDG PET/CT on treatment decision-making, and 3) to estimate the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in the restaging process among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: From the FDG PET/CT databases of San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy, and the Veneto Institute of Oncology in Padua, Italy, we selected 104 patients with a certain diagnosis of RCC after surgery, and for whom at least 24 months of post-surgical FDG PET/CT, clinical, and instrumental follow-up data was available. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT were assessed by histology and/or other imaging as standard of reference. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of outcome. RESULTS:FDG PET/CT resulted in a positive diagnosis in 58 patients and a negative diagnosis in 46 patients. Sensitivity and specificity were 74% and 80%, respectively. FDG PET/CT findings influenced therapeutic management in 45/104 cases (43%). After a median follow-up period of 37 months (± standard deviation 12.9), 51 (49%) patients had recurrence of disease, and 26 (25%) had died. In analysis of OS, positive versus negative FDG PET/CT was associated with worse cumulative survival rates over a 5-year period (19% vs. 69%, respectively; p <0.05). Similarly, a positive FDG PET/CT correlated with a lower 3-year PFS rate. In addition, univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that a positive scan, alone or in combination with disease stage III-IV or nuclear grading 3-4, was associated with high risk of progression (multivariate analysis = hazard ratios [HRs] of 4.01, 3.7, and 2.8, respectively; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool both in treatment decision-making and for predicting survival and progression in patients affected by RCC.
Authors: Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse; Thomas Meindl; Eva Coppenrath; Christoph Degenhart; Anno Graser; Michael Scherr; Maximilian F Reiser Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-02-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Borje Ljungberg; Karim Bensalah; Steven Canfield; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Peter Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Mohammad H Bagheri; Mark A Ahlman; Liza Lindenberg; Baris Turkbey; Jeffrey Lin; Ali Cahid Civelek; Ashkan A Malayeri; Piyush K Agarwal; Peter L Choyke; Les R Folio; Andrea B Apolo Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.498