| Literature DB >> 26268467 |
Petra B van den Doel1, Víctor Rodríguez Prieto2, Sarah E van Rossum-Fikkert3, Willem Schaftenaar4, Erin Latimer5, Lauren Howard6, Sarah Chapman7, Nic Masters8, Albert D M E Osterhaus9,10, Paul D Ling11, Akbar Dastjerdi12, Byron Martina13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elephants are classified as critically endangered animals by the International Union for Conservation of Species (IUCN). Elephant endotheliotropic herpesvirus (EEHV) poses a large threat to breeding programs of captive Asian elephants by causing fatal haemorrhagic disease. EEHV infection is detected by PCR in samples from both clinically ill and asymptomatic elephants with an active infection, whereas latent carriers can be distinguished exclusively via serological assays. To date, identification of latent carriers has been challenging, since there are no serological assays capable of detecting seropositive elephants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26268467 PMCID: PMC4535388 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0522-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Age, sex, and clinical status of elephants in the study cohort of European zoos
| Zoo | Animal | Sex | Born | Status | Age | Serostatus | Sample # | Period | PCR detection | Detection site | Clinical signs | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | F | captive | alive | 44 | pos | >50 | 2002–2014 | EEHV1B - 2007/2008 | O/V | subclinical | ref [ |
| 1 | A1 | F | captive | alive | 14 | pos | >50 | 2002–2014 | EEHV1B - 2007 | O | subclinical | ref [ |
| 1 | C | F | wild | alive | 28 | border | >50 | 2002–2012 | EEHV1B - 2008 | O | subclinical | ref [ |
| 1 | D | F | captive | alive | 12 | ND | >50 | 2013–2014 | EEHV1B - 2008 | O | subclinical | ref [ |
| 1 | E | M | captive | alive | 17 | pos | 2 | 2013–2014 | EEHV1 - 2014 | TW/C | subclinical | |
| 2 | A | M | captive | alive | 23 | ND | >50 | 2006–2013 | not detected | |||
| 2 | B | F | wild | alive | 31 | border | >50 | 2006–2013 | EEHV5 -2011 | TW | subclinical | |
| 2 | B1 | M | captive | alive | 10 | pos | 40–50 | 2006–2011 | EEHV1A - 2008/2011 | WB | subclinical | |
| 2 | B2 | M | captive | dead | 1 | pos | 3 | 2006–2013 | EEHV1A - 2009 | necropsy | fatality | |
| 2 | B3 | M | captive | alive | 3 | pos | 8 | 2012–2013 | EEHV1 - 2013 | WB | clinically ill 2013 | |
| 2 | C | F | wild | alive | 33 | ND | 40–50 | 2006–2013 | EEHV1A - 2011 | TW | subclinical | negative study control |
| 2 | D | F | wild | alive | 33 | border | 40–50 | 2006–2013 | not detected | nd | healthy | |
| 2 | E | F | captive | alive | 32 | pos | >50 | 2006–2013 | EEHV1A - 2011 | TW | subclinical | |
| 2 | E1 | F | captive | dead | 2 | pos | 3 | 2006 | EEHV1B - 2006 | necropsy | fatality | ref [ |
| 2 | E2 | F | captive | dead | 2 | pos | 3 | 2006–2013 | EEHV1A - 2009 | necropsy | fatality | |
| 2 | E3 | F | captive | alive | 5 | pos | >50 | 2006–2013 | EEHV1A - 2011 | TW | subclinical | |
| 2 | F | F | captive | alive | 16 | ND | >50 | 2006–2013 | EEHV1A - 2011 | U/V | subclinical | |
| 2 | F1 | M | captive | alive | 5 | pos | 20 | 2011–2013 | EEHV1A - 2011 | TW | subclinical | |
| 3 | A | F | captive | alive | 19 | ND | 40–50 | 2007–2012 | not available | |||
| 3 | B | F | wild | alive | 30 | pos | 40–50 | 2006–2012 | not available | |||
| 3 | C | F | wild | alive | 30 | border | 20 | 2012 | not available | |||
| 3 | C1 | F | captive | alive | 16 | border | 20 | 2012 | not available | |||
| 4 | A | M | captive | alive | 9 | pos | 2 | 2007–2014 | not done | positive study control | ||
| 5 | A | F | wild | alive | 29 | pos | 1 | 2002 | not done | positive study control |
Zoos are numbered, elephants are indicated with a letter and subsequent numbers describe maternal offspring
ND, not detectable
TW, trunk wash
C, conjunctiva
U, urine
O, oral lesion
WB, whole blood
V, vulva
Fig. 1SDS-PAGE total protein analysis (panel a) and Western blot analysis with an anti-His monoclonal antibody (panel b) demonstrate the purification of full length EEHV-gBHis (~87 kD) and several smaller fragments with a his-tag produced from the EEHV-gBHis open reading frame (lane EL, eluate). During purification a small portion of the recombinant protein is lost in the flow through of the NiNTA column (lane FT) and during the washing steps (lane W1-2, W3-4, W5-6). The empty vector does not yield any his-tagged proteins (lane UT). Lane M is the molecular weight marker
Fig. 2Western blot analysis of an irrelevant 27 kD his-tagged protein and (lane 1), single NiNTA purified EEHV-gBHis (lane 2) and double purified NiNTA/HisTrap FPLC (lane 3) with three different antisera. a Western blot with mouse monoclonal anti-His demonstrates the 27 kD His-tagged protein in lane 1 and the highly fragmented EEHV-gBHis in lane 2 and 3. Double purification results in loss of the full length EEHV-gBHis (lane 3). bThe rabbit peptide (ANVTSRRRKRDANTA) EEHV-gB specific antiserum recognizes non-his tagged bands. c Serum of elephant 4A detects identical bands as the rabbit peptide specific serum in the EEHV-gBHis recombinant protein, except for the ~32 kD band which might be an E.coli background band (panel b)
Fig. 3E. coli protein contamination in the purified antigen (Ag) induces background signal in an indirect ELISA (panel a). This background is reduced in a sandwich ELISA using a mouse monoclonal anti-his antibody as a capture antibody for the target antigen (panel b-d). Pooled EEHV-gB peptide specific rabbit serum was used in a 1:200 dilution. Panel A no capture antibody, panel B 100 ng capture antibody, panel c 200 ng capture antibody, panel D 300 ng capture antibody
Fig. 4Specificity of the EEHV-gB sandwich ELISA was determined by antigen titration with the EEHV-gB peptide specific rabbit serum, one serum of an EEHV1 PCR positive elephant and two irrelevant rabbit sera. All sera were diluted 1:200 in ELISA buffer
Fig. 5Characterization of the sandwich ELISA with elephant sera. Elephant sera react in a dose-dependent manner as shown by antigen titration (panel a) and are specific for the EEHV-gB antigen only (panel b)
age, sex, and clinical EEHV status of elephants in the study cohort of USA zoos
| Zoo | Animal | Sex | Born | Status | Age | Serostatus | Sample # | Period | PCR detection | Detection site | Clinical signs | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | M | wild | alive | 50 | ND | 13 | 2006–2012 | EEHV5A (2011) | TW | subclinical | |
| 1 | B | F | wild | alive | 46 | border | 13 | 2006–2012 | EEHV1B (2009)/EEHV5(2011) | WB | Lethargic | ref [ |
| 1 | C | F | wild | alive | 34 | ND | 9 | 2008–2012 | EEHV1A-(2009)/EEHV5B (2011) | TW | subclinical | ref [ |
| 1 | C1 | M | captive | alive | 10 | ND | 9 | 2008–2012 | EEHV1A/EEHV1B/EEHV5B | TW/WB | subclinical | ref [ |
| 1 | C2 | F | captive | alive | 4 | pos | 2 | 2012 | EEHV5A (2011) | TW | Subclinical | ref [ |
| 2 | D | F | captive | alive | 24 | pos | 13 | 2006–2012 | EEHV1A(2009)/EEHV1B (2010) | TW/WB 2010 | Subclinical | ref [ |
| 2 | D1 | M | captive | alive | 5 | pos | 2 | 2010–2012 | EEHV5A (2011) | TW/WB | Temporal gland swelling | ref [ |
| 2 | A | F | wild | alive | 44 | pos | 11 | 2006–2011 | not detected | |||
| 2 | B | F | wild | alive | 44 | ND | 12 | 2006–2011 | not detected | |||
| 2 | B1 | M | captive | alive | 22 | pos | 11 | 2006–2011 | not detected | |||
| 2 | C | F | wild | alive | 44 | ND | 11 | 2006–2011 | not detected | ref [ | ||
| 2 | C1 | F | captive | alive | 8 | pos | 6 | 2009–2011 | EEHV1A (2010)/EEHV1B (2009) | WB/TW | subclinical feb/dec 2009 | ref [ |
| 2 | D | F | wild | alive | 35 | pos | 11 | 2006–2011 | not detected | |||
| 2 | E | F | captive | alive | 18 | pos | 11 | 2006–2011 | not detected | |||
| 2 | E1 | F | captive | alive | 8 | pos | 5 | 2009–2011 | EEHV1A/EEHV1B (2009) | WB/TW | clinically ill feb/dec 2009 | ref [ |
| 2 | A | F | wild | alive | 45 | pos | 7 | 2006–2010 | not available | |||
| 2 | B | F | wild | alive | 44 | pos | 7 | 2006–2010 | not available | |||
| 2 | B1 | F | captive | alive | 16 | pos | 7 | 2006–2010 | not available | |||
| 3 | C | F | wild | dead | 41 | border | 4 | 2006–2007 | not available | |||
| 3 | D | F | captive | alive | 26 | pos | 7 | 2006–2010 | not available | |||
| 3 | A | F | wild | alive | 48 | border | 10 | 2006–2011 | not done | |||
| 3 | B | F | wild | alive | 41 | border | 9 | 2006–2011 | not done | |||
| 4 | B1 | F | captive | alive | 22 | pos | 10 | 2006–2011 | not done | |||
| 5 | B1-1 | F | captive | alive | 5 | pos | 1 | 2010 | not detected | |||
| 1 | C | M | captive | alive | 17 | pos | 10 | 2006–2011 | not detected | |||
| 1 | D | M | captive | alive | 16 | pos | 7 | 2006–2009 | not detected |
Zoos are numbered, elephants are indicated with a letter and subsequent numbers describe maternal offspring
ND, not detectable
TW, trunk wash
C, conjunctiva
U, urine
O, oral lesion
WB, whole blood
V, vulva
Fig. 6Serostatus of three European zoos measured as the signal to background ratio over a period of time. Zoo 1 (panel a) was studied from October 2012 until April 2014. Zoo 2 (panel b) was studied from May 2012 until May 2013 and Zoo 3 (panel c) from January 2012 until September 2012. The arrow indicates a positive EEHV1 PCR of the trunk wash (animal 1A) or whole blood (animal 2B3). Elephants with non-detectable levels of EEHV antibodies are indicated in black, elephants with an alternating serostatus in orange and elephants with continuous anti-EEHV antibodies in red