Literature DB >> 26268452

When Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Really Avoid Radiotherapy? Clinical Predictors of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer.

Andrea Papadia1, Filippo Bellati2,3, Giorgio Bogani1, Antonino Ditto1, Fabio Martinelli1, Domenica Lorusso1, Cristina Donfrancesco1,4, Maria Luisa Gasparri1,4, Francesco Raspagliesi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify clinical variables that may predict the need for adjuvant radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.
METHODS: A retrospective series of cervical cancer patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IB2-IIB treated with NACT followed by radical surgery was analyzed. Clinical predictors of persistence of intermediate- and/or high-risk factors at final pathological analysis were investigated. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate analysis and using a model based on artificial intelligence known as artificial neuronal network (ANN) analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 101 patients were available for the analyses. Fifty-two (51 %) patients were considered at high risk secondary to parametrial, resection margin and/or lymph node involvement. When disease was confined to the cervix, four (4 %) patients were considered at intermediate risk. At univariate analysis, FIGO grade 3, stage IIB disease at diagnosis and the presence of enlarged nodes before NACT predicted the presence of intermediate- and/or high-risk factors at final pathological analysis. At multivariate analysis, only FIGO grade 3 and tumor diameter maintained statistical significance. The specificity of ANN models in evaluating predictive variables was slightly superior to conventional multivariable models.
CONCLUSIONS: FIGO grade, stage, tumor diameter, and histology are associated with persistence of pathological intermediate- and/or high-risk factors after NACT and radical surgery. This information is useful in counseling patients at the time of treatment planning with regard to the probability of being subjected to pelvic radiotherapy after completion of the initially planned treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26268452     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4799-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of Stage IIB Cervical Cancer: an Overview of the Current Evidence.

Authors:  Shinya Matsuzaki; Maximilian Klar; Mikio Mikami; Muneaki Shimada; Brendan H Grubbs; Keiichi Fujiwara; Lynda D Roman; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Gynecologic oncology at the time of COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Giorgio Bogani; Claudia Brusadelli; Rocco Guerrisi; Salvatore Lopez; Mauro Signorelli; Antonino Ditto; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  A retrospective study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical hysterectomy versus radical hysterectomy alone in patients with stage II cervical squamous cell carcinoma presenting as a bulky mass.

Authors:  Eriko Takatori; Tadahiro Shoji; Anna Takada; Takayuki Nagasawa; Hideo Omi; Masahiro Kagabu; Tatsuya Honda; Fumiharu Miura; Satoshi Takeuchi; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.