Correction: Brain Extraction Using Label Propagation and Group Agreement: Pincram.

The images for Figs 1 and 2 are incorrectly switched. The image that appears as Fig 1 should be Fig 2, and the image that appears as Fig 2 should be Fig 1. The figure captions appear in the correct order.

Fig 1

Sample images chosen randomly from each dataset.

Images were visually centred at the level of the commissures approximately in the centre of the left thalamus to acquire a transverse (top rows) and a sagittal (bottom rows) slice. Left column, O, H, L: manual reference masks, X: generated mask (OXsetup). Middle column, O, H, L, X: generated masks (HX setup in the case of X). Right column, O, H, L, X: discrepancies between the masks—green indicates overinclusion, red indicates underinclusion. Individual JCs were 0.9512 (O), 0.9704 (H), 0.9647 (L), and 0.9503 (X).

Fig 2

Overview diagram of pincram workflow.

Step numbers in the text correspond to numbered boxes. C : pre-selection fused mask;M : tight margin (boundary neighborhood) mask; F : fuzzy label summed from rank-selected subset; : brain mask generated from F by thresholding and binarization; wide margin mask generated from F by thresholding and binarization