Literature DB >> 26267123

Assessment of liver fibrosis by variable flip angle T1 mapping at 3.0T.

Zhiming Li1, Jihong Sun1, Xi Hu1, Ning Huang2, Guocan Han1, Lumin Chen1, Yurong Zhou1, Weixian Bai1, Xiaoming Yang1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of using a variable flip angle (VFA) T1 mapping technique to diagnose liver fibrosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver fibrosis was induced in rabbits by repetitive administration of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4 ). T1 -weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 29 animals (liver fibrosis, n = 18; control, n = 11) using a series of nonenhanced liver acquisition volume acceleration (LAVA) with VFAs at 3.0T. Hepatic T1 relaxation times were measured via regions of interest, which were correlated with subsequent histologic confirmation. The results of T1 mapping in assessment of liver fibrosis were compared with that of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values.
RESULTS: The mean T1 relaxation time of the control group was the lowest (250.07 ± 88.12 msec), followed by the nonadvanced fibrosis group (387.83 ± 166.58 msec) and the advanced fibrosis group (496.90 ± 291.24 msec). T1 relaxation time measurements differed significantly between the liver fibrosis group and control group (P < 0.05), with a trend of increased mean T1 relaxation times as the fibrotic stage increased. Statistically significant differences were observed between the control group and the nonadvanced fibrosis group (P < 0.05), however with much overlap between the less severe stages. In discriminating between the control group and liver fibrosis group, stage F0-1 (control and stage F1) and stage F2-3, stage F0-2 (control and stage F1-2) and stage F3, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.803 (cutoff value 273.01 msec), 0.712 (cutoff value 371.54 msec), and 0.696 (cutoff value 276.99 msec), respectively. No difference was found between T1 relaxation times and ADC values in assessment of liver fibrosis in our study.
CONCLUSION: VFA T1 mapping may become a noninvasive imaging tool for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T1 mapping; liver fibrosis; magnetic resonance imaging; variable flip angle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26267123     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  21 in total

1.  T1 mapping, T2 mapping and MR elastography of the liver for detection and staging of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  David H Hoffman; Abimbola Ayoola; Dominik Nickel; Fei Han; Hersh Chandarana; Krishna Prasad Shanbhogue
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

2.  Association of Liver Fibrosis With Cardiovascular Diseases in the General Population: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Mohammad R Ostovaneh; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Tomoki Fuji; Hooman Bakhshi; Ravi Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Russell P Tracy; Eliseo Guallar; Colin O Wu; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease Events and T1 Mapping Defined Hepatic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Michelle T Long; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Native T1 mapping compared to ultrasound elastography for staging and monitoring liver fibrosis: an animal study of repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy.

Authors:  Jinning Li; Huanhuan Liu; Caiyuan Zhang; Shuyan Yang; Yanshu Wang; Weibo Chen; Xin Li; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Free-breathing multitasking multi-echo MRI for whole-liver water-specific T1 , proton density fat fraction, and R 2 quantification.

Authors:  Nan Wang; Tianle Cao; Fei Han; Yibin Xie; Xiaodong Zhong; Sen Ma; Alan Kwan; Zhaoyang Fan; Hui Han; Xiaoming Bi; Mazen Noureddin; Vibhas Deshpande; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Performance of native and gadoxetate-enhanced liver and spleen T1 mapping for noninvasive diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension: preliminary results.

Authors:  Emre Altinmakas; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Rayane Issa; Guillermo Carbonell; Ghadi Abboud; Thomas D Schiano; Swan Thung; Aaron Fischman; Matthew D Kelly; Scott L Friedman; Paul Kennedy; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-09-09

7.  Characterizing Fibrosis and Inflammation in a Partial Bile Duct Ligation Mouse Model by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jia-Yi Liu; Ye-Yu Cai; Zhu-Yuan Ding; Zi-Yi Zhou; Min Lv; Huan Liu; Li-Yun Zheng; Lan Li; Yong-Heng Luo; En-Hua Xiao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.119

8.  Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy.

Authors:  J G Nam; K M Kang; S H Choi; W H Lim; R-E Yoo; J-H Kim; T J Yun; C-H Sohn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Prospective comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for detection and staging of hepatic fibrosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Authors:  S Keller; J Sedlacik; T Schuler; R Buchert; M Avanesov; R Zenouzi; A W Lohse; H Kooijman; J Fiehler; C Schramm; J Yamamura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Amphiphilic branched polymer-nitroxides conjugate as a nanoscale agent for potential magnetic resonance imaging of multiple objects in vivo.

Authors:  Xiaoming Wang; Shiwei Guo; Zhiqian Li; Qiang Luo; Yan Dai; Hu Zhang; Yun Ye; Qiyong Gong; Kui Luo
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.