| Literature DB >> 26266922 |
Jukka Räsänen1, Michael E Nemergut, Noam Gavriely.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute lung injury (ALI) is known to be associated with the emergence of inspiratory crackles and enhanced transmission of artificial sounds from the airway opening to the chest wall. Recently, we described the effect of ALI on the basic flow-induced breath sounds, separated from the crackles. In this study, we investigated the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on these noncrackling basic lung sounds augmented during ALI.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 26266922 PMCID: PMC4512991 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-014-0025-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
The pre-injury effect of 10 cmH O PEEP on variables reflecting cardiopulmonary function and breath sound spectral power in six anesthetized, mechanically ventilated uninjured pigs
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (bpm) | 86 ± 16 | 84 ± 12 | 81 ± 13 | NS |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 88 ± 13 | 74 ± 11 | 93 ± 11 | <0.01 |
| Cardiac output (L/min) | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | <0.01 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 92 ± 18 | 102 ± 20 | 97 ± 16 | NS |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 37 ± 2 | 37 ± 3 | 39 ± 2 | NS |
| pHa | 7.44 ± 0.01 | 7.45 ± 0.03 | 7.42 ± 0.02 | NS |
| SaO2 (%) | 94 ± 3 | 95 ± 3 | 94 ± 4 | NS |
| Venous admixture (%) | 19 ± 13 | 10 ± 12 | 13 ± 14 | <0.05 |
| Cst (ml/cmH2O) | 30 ± 6 | 26 ± 4 | 33 ± 4 | NS |
| Average spectral power (dB) | −65.2 ± 7.8 | −68.3 ± 4.8 | −67.6 ± 3.9 | NS |
| Spectral power 150 to 1,200 Hz (dB) | −60.1 ± 7.1 | −64.2 ± 4.7 | −62.6 ± 3.2 | <0.05 |
| Spectral power 1,200 to 3,000 Hz (dB) | −67.8 ± 8.2 | −70.4 ± 4.9 | −70.3 ± 4.4 | NS |
Cst, static respiratory system compliance; NS, not statistically significant. Physiologic data published previously [3,5]. Values are mean ± SD. p values refer to overall effect of PEEP (Friedman's analysis of variance).
The effect of oleic acid-induced lung injury, and incremental application of PEEP on variables reflecting cardiopulmonary function in six anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Heart rate (bpm) | 81 ± 14 | 92 ± 12 | 91 ± 17 | 94 ± 18 | 100 ± 14 | 94 ± 8 | NS |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg) | 93 ± 11 | 68 ± 4 | 66 ± 4 | 67 ± 4 | 76 ± 6 | 78 ± 9 | <0.001 |
| Core temperature (°C) | 35.7 ± 0.5 | 35.5 ± 0.6 | 35.6 ± 0.6 | 35.5 ± 0.6 | 35.5 ± 0.6 | 35.5 ± 0.6 | NS |
| Cardiac output (L/min) | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 97 ± 17 | 82 ± 12 | 119 ± 33 | 174 ± 32 | 237 ± 33 | 76 ± 8 | <0.001 |
| PaCO2(mmHg) | 39 ± 2 | 51 ± 6 | 47 ± 4 | 45 ± 4 | 44 ± 5 | 50 ± 6 | <0.001 |
| pHa | 7.42 ± 0.02 | 7.33 ± 0.03 | 7.35 ± 0.04 | 7.37 ± 0.03 | 7.37 ± 0.04 | 7.34 ± 0.03 | <0.001 |
| SaO2 | 94 ± 4 | 91 ± 4 | 95 ± 2 | 97 ± 1 | 98 ± 0 | 90 ± 4 | <0.001 |
| Ventilator rate (cpm) | 17 ± 2 | 20 ± 2 | 20 ± 2 | 20 ± 2 | 20 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | <0.001 |
| Tidal volume (ml) | 377 ± 25 | 357 ± 29 | 370 ± 15 | 370 ± 15 | 365 ± 21 | 365 ± 23 | NS |
| FIO2 | 0.22 ± 0 | 0.52 ± 0.22 | 0.52 ± 0.22 | 0.52 ± 0.20 | 0.53 ± 0.21 | 0.62 ± 0.26 | NT |
| Venous admixture (%) | 13 ± 14 | 57 ± 13 | 45 ± 18 | 32 ± 19 | 16 ± 18 | 65 ± 11 | <0.001 |
| Cst (ml/cmH2O) | 33 ± 5 | 16 ± 3 | 19 ± 3 | 22 ± 3 | 23 ± 2 | 18 ± 3 | <0.001 |
ALI, acute lung injury; Cst, static respiratory system compliance; NS, not statistically significant; NT, variable not statistically tested. Physiologic data published previously [3,5]. Values are mean ± SD. p values refer to the overall effect of PEEP (Friedman's analysis of variance).
Figure 1Changes in average (± SD) and individual (dots) spectral power with lung injury (arrow) and PEEP (*: p < 0.05).
Figure 2Single inspiratory waveform (top) and spectral (bottom) displays from the right midlung of a representative animal showing sample regions and late inspiratory crackles. The respective audio recordings are available (Additional files 1, 2, 3).
Figure 3Effect of sensor location over nondependent vs. dependent lung on spectral changes from lung injury and PEEP.
Figure 4Spectral changes (mean±SD) broken down by sensor location at low (panel A) and high (panel B) frequency ranges (*: p < 0.05, †: p < 0.01 compared to the injured state before PEEP).
Figure 5All data points of venous admixture plotted against concurrent change in spectral power over nondependent lung before (grey dots) and after (black dots) lung injury.