| Literature DB >> 26266908 |
Björn P Bark1, Per-Olof Grände.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous experimental studies have shown that vitamin C has several beneficial effects in sepsis and burns, such as decreased tissue oedema, improved endothelial barrier function and decreased transcapillary leakage of plasma markers. It has still not been investigated, though, if vitamin C has any impact specifically on plasma volume. The present study aims at testing the hypothesis that vitamin C decreases plasma volume loss in sepsis.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 26266908 PMCID: PMC4512993 DOI: 10.1186/2197-425X-2-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Figure 1Time scale of the experiment. PV1, plasma volume at baseline; PV2, plasma volume 3 h after surgical preparation just before the start of treatment; PV3, plasma volume at the end of the experiment; ABG, arterial blood sample for analysis of blood gases, hematocrit, lactate and electrolytes.
Physiological data
| Na+(mmol/L) | K+(mmol/L) | Hct (%) | Lac (mmol/L) | pH | PaCo2(kPa) | PaO2(kPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bolus + infusion group ( | |||||||
| Baseline | 136 ± 2 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 42 ± 1 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 7.48 ± 0.04 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 11.0 ± 0.8 |
| 3 h after prep | 133 ± 3 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 45 ± 3 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 7.44 ± 0.03 | 4.9 ± 0.5 | 10.8 ± 0.7 |
| End of experiment | 135 ± 2 | 6.2 ± 0.8*** | 50 ± 5** | 3.2 ± 0.7** | 7.43 ± 0.04* | 4.2 ± 0.4** | 11.4 ± 0.5 |
| Bolus group ( | |||||||
| Baseline | 137 ± 2 | 4.4 ± 0.3 | 42 ± 3 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 7.48 ± 0.03 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 11.1 ± 0.6 |
| 3 h after prep | 133 ± 2 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 45 ± 3 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 7.44 ± 0.02 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 11.4 ± 0.5 |
| End of experiment | 135 ± 2 | 5.8 ± 0.9*** | 50 ± 4*** | 3.4 ± 0.8** | 7.43 ± 0.04** | 3.7 ± 0.7*** | 12.5 ± 1.3 |
| Sham group ( | |||||||
| Baseline | 136 ± 2 | 4.8 ± 0.6 | 43 ± 2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 7.48 ± 0.05 | 4.9 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 0.9 |
| 3 h after prep | 134 ± 2 | 5.1 ± 0.6 | 45 ± 1 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 7.45 ± 0.03 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 11.0 ± 1.0 |
| End of experiment | 134 ± 2 | 5.9 ± 0.6** | 49 ± 2*** | 2.9 ± 0.7* | 7.44 ± 0.03* | 4.1 ± 0.3*** | 12.0 ± 0.7 |
Data (mean ± SD) for sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), haematocrit (Hct), lactate (Lac), pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2). There were no significant differences between any of the parameters analysed, between groups at any time points. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used for the statistical analyses. There were significant differences in K+, Hct, Lac, pH and Paco2 between baseline and the end of the experiments in all groups. Unpaired two-tailed Student's t test was used for the analyses. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Blood pressure
| Baseline | 3 h after surg prep | 1.5 h after start of treatment | 3 h after start of treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bolus + infusion group ( | 96 ± 11 | 92 ± 12 | 99 ± 14 | 96 ± 13 |
| Bolus group ( | 88 ± 15 | 91 ± 12 | 92 ± 16 | 90 ± 13 |
| Sham group ( | 95 ± 12 | 90 ± 11 | 94 ± 7 | 93 ± 7 |
Data (mean ± SD) for mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) at baseline, at 3 h after the surgical preparation and at 1.5 and 3 h after the start of treatment. There were no differences between any of the groups at any time points. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used for the statistical analyses.
Figure 2Plasma volumes. Plasma volumes at baseline (PV1), at 3 h after the surgical preparation just before the start of treatment (PV2) and at the end of the experiment (PV3). There was no significant difference between any of the groups at any time points. There was a significant difference between PV1 and PV2, and PV2 and PV3 for all groups. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used for the statistical analyses (**p < 0.01).
Figure 3Urine production. Data for urine production (mL/kg) from the end of surgical preparation to the end of the experiment. There was a significantly larger urine production in the B group compared to the S group. Student's t test was used for the statistical analyses (***p < 0.001).