Massimiliano Pacilio1, Guido Ventroni2, Giuseppe De Vincentis3, Bartolomeo Cassano4, Rosanna Pellegrini5, Elisabetta Di Castro3, Viviana Frantellizzi3, Giulia Anna Follacchio3, Tatiana Garkavaya3, Leda Lorenzon4, Pasquale Ialongo6, Roberto Pani5, Lucio Mango2. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Circonvallazione Gianicolense no. 87, 00152, Rome, Italy. mpacilio@scamilloforlanini.rm.it. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Circonvallazione Gianicolense no. 87, 00152, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico no. 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. 4. Postgraduate School of Medical Physics, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro no. 5, 00185, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161, Rome, Italy. 6. Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Circonvallazione Gianicolense no. 87, 00152, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ra-dichloride is an alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical used in the treatment of bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer. Image-based dosimetric studies remain challenging because the emitted photons are few. The aim of this study was to implement a methodology for in-vivo quantitative planar imaging, and to assess the absorbed dose to lesions using the MIRD approach. METHODS: The study included nine Caucasian patients with 24 lesions (6 humeral head lesions, 4 iliac wing lesions, 2 scapular lesions, 5 trochanter lesions, 3 vertebral lesions, 3 glenoid lesions, 1 coxofemoral lesion). The treatment consisted of six injections (one every 4 weeks) of 50 kBq per kg body weight. Gamma-camera calibrations for (223)Ra included measurements of sensitivity and transmission curves. Patients were statically imaged for 30 min, using an MEGP collimator, double-peak acquisition, and filtering to improve the image quality. Lesions were delineated on (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body images, and the ROIs superimposed on the (223)Ra images after image coregistration. The activity was quantified with background, attenuation, and scatter correction. Absorbed doses were assessed deriving the S values from the S factors for soft-tissue spheres of OLINDA/EXM, evaluating the lesion volumes by delineation on the CT images. RESULTS: In 12 lesions with a wash-in phase the biokinetics were assumed to be biexponential, and to be monoexponential in the remainder. The optimal timing for serial acquisitions was between 1 and 5 h, between 18 and 24 h, between 48 and 60 h, and between 7 and 15 days. The error in cumulated activity neglecting the wash-in phase was between 2 % and 12 %. The mean effective half-life (T 1/2eff) of (223)Ra was 8.2 days (range 5.5-11.4 days). The absorbed dose (D) after the first injection was 0.7 Gy (range 0.2-1.9 Gy. Considering the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of alpha particles (RBE = 5), D RBE = 899 mGy/MBq (range 340-2,450 mGy/MBq). The percent uptake of (99m)Tc and (223)Ra (activity extrapolated to t = 0) were significantly correlated. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of in vivo quantitative imaging in (223)Ra therapy was confirmed. The lesion uptake of (223)Ra-dichloride was significantly correlated with that of (99m)Tc-MDP. The D RBE to lesions per unit administered activity was much higher than that of other bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals, but considering a standard administration of 21 MBq (six injections of 50 kBq/kg to a 70-kg patient), the mean cumulative value of D RBE was about 19 Gy, and was therefore in the range of those of other radiopharmaceuticals. The macrodosimetry of bone metastases in treatments with (223)Ra-dichloride is feasible, but more work is needed to demonstrate its helpfulness in predicting clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE:Ra-dichloride is an alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical used in the treatment of bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer. Image-based dosimetric studies remain challenging because the emitted photons are few. The aim of this study was to implement a methodology for in-vivo quantitative planar imaging, and to assess the absorbed dose to lesions using the MIRD approach. METHODS: The study included nine Caucasian patients with 24 lesions (6 humeral head lesions, 4 iliac wing lesions, 2 scapular lesions, 5 trochanter lesions, 3 vertebral lesions, 3 glenoid lesions, 1 coxofemoral lesion). The treatment consisted of six injections (one every 4 weeks) of 50 kBq per kg body weight. Gamma-camera calibrations for (223)Ra included measurements of sensitivity and transmission curves. Patients were statically imaged for 30 min, using an MEGP collimator, double-peak acquisition, and filtering to improve the image quality. Lesions were delineated on (99m)Tc-MDP whole-body images, and the ROIs superimposed on the (223)Ra images after image coregistration. The activity was quantified with background, attenuation, and scatter correction. Absorbed doses were assessed deriving the S values from the S factors for soft-tissue spheres of OLINDA/EXM, evaluating the lesion volumes by delineation on the CT images. RESULTS: In 12 lesions with a wash-in phase the biokinetics were assumed to be biexponential, and to be monoexponential in the remainder. The optimal timing for serial acquisitions was between 1 and 5 h, between 18 and 24 h, between 48 and 60 h, and between 7 and 15 days. The error in cumulated activity neglecting the wash-in phase was between 2 % and 12 %. The mean effective half-life (T 1/2eff) of (223)Ra was 8.2 days (range 5.5-11.4 days). The absorbed dose (D) after the first injection was 0.7 Gy (range 0.2-1.9 Gy. Considering the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of alpha particles (RBE = 5), D RBE = 899 mGy/MBq (range 340-2,450 mGy/MBq). The percent uptake of (99m)Tc and (223)Ra (activity extrapolated to t = 0) were significantly correlated. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of in vivo quantitative imaging in (223)Ra therapy was confirmed. The lesion uptake of (223)Ra-dichloride was significantly correlated with that of (99m)Tc-MDP. The D RBE to lesions per unit administered activity was much higher than that of other bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals, but considering a standard administration of 21 MBq (six injections of 50 kBq/kg to a 70-kg patient), the mean cumulative value of D RBE was about 19 Gy, and was therefore in the range of those of other radiopharmaceuticals. The macrodosimetry of bone metastases in treatments with (223)Ra-dichloride is feasible, but more work is needed to demonstrate its helpfulness in predicting clinical outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
223Ra-dichloride; Bone metastases; Dosimetry; Radionuclide therapy
Authors: Jorge A Carrasquillo; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; John L Humm; Dana E Rathkopf; Susan F Slovin; Matthew J Williamson; Kristine Lacuna; Anne-Kirsti Aksnes; Steven M Larson; Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: S Nilsson; P Strang; A K Aksnes; L Franzèn; P Olivier; A Pecking; J Staffurth; S Vasanthan; C Andersson; Ø S Bruland Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Sten Nilsson; Roy H Larsen; Sophie D Fosså; Lise Balteskard; Kari W Borch; Jan-Erik Westlin; Gro Salberg; Oyvind S Bruland Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: H R Maxon; L E Schroder; V S Hertzberg; S R Thomas; E E Englaro; R Samaratunga; H Smith; J S Moulton; C C Williams; G J Ehrhardt Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1991-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert F Hobbs; Hong Song; Christopher J Watchman; Wesley E Bolch; Anne-Kirsti Aksnes; Thomas Ramdahl; Glenn D Flux; George Sgouros Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Iain Murray; Sarah J Chittenden; Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Cecilia Hindorf; Christopher C Parker; Sue Chua; Glenn D Flux Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Vivek Subbiah; Pete M Anderson; Kalevi Kairemo; Kenneth Hess; Winston W Huh; Vinod Ravi; Najat C Daw; Neeta Somaiah; Joseph A Ludwig; Robert S Benjamin; Sant Chawla; David S Hong; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gregory Ravizzini; Eugenie Kleinerman; Homer Macapinlac; Eric Rohren Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thorsten D Poeppel; Daria Handkiewicz-Junak; Michael Andreeff; Alexander Becherer; Andreas Bockisch; Eva Fricke; Lilli Geworski; Alexander Heinzel; Bernd J Krause; Thomas Krause; Markus Mitterhauser; Wilfried Sonnenschein; Lisa Bodei; Roberto C Delgado-Bolton; Michael Gabriel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Brian D Yard; Priyanka Gopal; Kristina Bannik; Gerhard Siemeister; Urs B Hagemann; Mohamed E Abazeed Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Diane S Abou; Andrew Rittenbach; Ryan E Tomlinson; Paige A Finley; Benjamin Tsui; Brian W Simons; Abhinav K Jha; David Ulmert; Ryan C Riddle; Daniel L J Thorek Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Michael J Morris; Eva Corey; Theresa A Guise; James L Gulley; William Kevin Kelly; David I Quinn; Arne Scholz; George Sgouros Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 14.432