Bharti Bhandari1, Lokesh Kumar2, Anjum Datta3, Sabyasachi Sircar4. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Jodhpur, India . 2. Undergraduate Student, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Jodhpur, India . 3. Junior Resident, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Jodhpur, India . 4. Professor and Head, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Jodhpur, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The QTc interval depends largely on cardiac repolarization since the duration of cardiac depolarization is fairly constant in the normal heart. QTc at rest as well as during exercise has many clinical implications. In this study, we have compared the relative effects of dynamic and static exercise on QTc. AIM: To measure QTc interval in young men at rest and also assess how it is further modulated by submaximal dynamic and static exercises. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study was conducted in the Department of Physiology on 30 non-obese young men randomly selected from the students of our institute after obtaining the consent and institutional ethical clearance. Continuous blood pressure monitoring and ECG recording was done in the subjects. Baseline (pre-exercise), post submaximal dynamic (Harvard's step test) and post submaximal static exercise (hand-grip exercise) recordings of ABP and ECG were taken for analysis. The measured QT interval was corrected for heart rate using the formula of Bazett et al., {QTc=QT/RR(1/2)}.Statistical analysis was done using Graph pad Prism 5 software (California, USA). The baseline and post-exercise data were compared using paired t-test. A p<0.05 was taken to be statistical significant. RESULTS: There were statistically significant increases in HR, SBP, DBP and QTc interval after dynamic exercise in comparison to the baseline values (p<0.05). Significant increase in HR (p<0.05) with no significant change in QTc and other cardiovascular parameters were recorded following static exercise (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Significant increase in QTc interval was observed after dynamic exercise, however, no change in QTc was observed following static exercise, and hence we conclude that static exercises may not be useful in assessing the cardiovascular status of an individual or in predicting cardiovascular events.
INTRODUCTION: The QTc interval depends largely on cardiac repolarization since the duration of cardiac depolarization is fairly constant in the normal heart. QTc at rest as well as during exercise has many clinical implications. In this study, we have compared the relative effects of dynamic and static exercise on QTc. AIM: To measure QTc interval in young men at rest and also assess how it is further modulated by submaximal dynamic and static exercises. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study was conducted in the Department of Physiology on 30 non-obese young men randomly selected from the students of our institute after obtaining the consent and institutional ethical clearance. Continuous blood pressure monitoring and ECG recording was done in the subjects. Baseline (pre-exercise), post submaximal dynamic (Harvard's step test) and post submaximal static exercise (hand-grip exercise) recordings of ABP and ECG were taken for analysis. The measured QT interval was corrected for heart rate using the formula of Bazett et al., {QTc=QT/RR(1/2)}.Statistical analysis was done using Graph pad Prism 5 software (California, USA). The baseline and post-exercise data were compared using paired t-test. A p<0.05 was taken to be statistical significant. RESULTS: There were statistically significant increases in HR, SBP, DBP and QTc interval after dynamic exercise in comparison to the baseline values (p<0.05). Significant increase in HR (p<0.05) with no significant change in QTc and other cardiovascular parameters were recorded following static exercise (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Significant increase in QTc interval was observed after dynamic exercise, however, no change in QTc was observed following static exercise, and hence we conclude that static exercises may not be useful in assessing the cardiovascular status of an individual or in predicting cardiovascular events.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiac repolarization; Electrocardiography; Hand grip test; Harvard’s step test
Authors: Poliana H Leite; Ruth C Melo; Marcelo F Mello; Ester da Silva; Audrey Borghi-Silva; Aparecida M Catai Journal: Rev Bras Fisioter Date: 2010 Sep-Oct
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-12-20 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Bert E Suys; Sophie J A Huybrechts; Daniel De Wolf; Lieve Op De Beeck; Dirk Matthys; B Van Overmeire; Marc V l Du Caju; Raoul P A Rooman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Kathleen Bird; Gabriel Chan; Huiqi Lu; Heloise Greeff; John Allen; Derek Abbott; Carlo Menon; Nigel H Lovell; Newton Howard; Wee-Shian Chan; Richard Ribon Fletcher; Aymen Alian; Rabab Ward; Mohamed Elgendi Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2020-12-04