| Literature DB >> 26265908 |
Hiroshi Kunikata1, Toru Nakazawa2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT)-assisted 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) in eyes with vitreoretinal disease.Entities:
Keywords: Intraoperative optical coherence tomography; Microincision vitrectomy surgery; Triamcinolone acetonide; Twenty-seven-gauge vitrectomy; Vitreoretinal disease
Year: 2015 PMID: 26265908 PMCID: PMC4519593 DOI: 10.1159/000437014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Ophthalmol ISSN: 1663-2699
Description of patients who underwent iOCT-assisted 27-gauge vitrectomy
| Patient No./sex/ age, years | Eye | Ophthalmological diagnosis | Pre-operative decimal VA | Post-operative decimal VA | iOCT findings | Impact on surgeon's intraoperative judgement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/M/85 | RE | VH due to branch retinal vein occlusion | HM | 1.2 | Confirmation that no macular edema or ERM was present after removal of the VH | Surgeon performed no additional procedures, such as removal of the ERM or ILM |
| 2/F/64 | RE | Vitreomacular traction syndrome | 0.06 | 0.4 | Confirmation that ERM remained after the release of vitreomacular traction | Surgeon removed the ERM and ILM |
| 3/M/84 | RE | ERM (lamellar MH) | 0.5 | 0.8 | Confirmation that no iatrogenic MH was created during or after removal of the ERM and ILM | Surgeon performed no additional procedures, such as FAX |
| 4/M/54 | RE | Macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with VH | 0.3 | 1.2 | Confirmation that macular detachment did not occur during FAX | Surgeon performed no additional procedures, such as removal of preretinal fluid, after successful endophotocoagulation |
| 5/F/73 | LE | Retinal detachment due to MH in highly myopic eye | 0.01 | 0.04 | Confirmation that removal of subretinal fluid from the macula was successful during FAX | Surgeon completed the removal of subretinal fluid through the MH |
| 6/M/55 | RE | MH after ERM removal in highly myopic eye | 0.5 | 0.8 | Confirmation that the autologous ILM was properly placed in the fovea during and after FAX | Surgeon performed no additional procedures, such as retransplantation of another graft from another region |
M = Male; F = female; RE = right eye; LE = left eye; VA = visual acuity; VH = vitreous hemorrhage; HM = hand movement; ERM = epiretinal membrane; ILM = internal limiting membrane; MH = macular hole; FAX = fluid-air exchange.
Fig. 1Pairs of images showing the effect of real-time feedback on surgical course in 6 patients. Images were obtained simultaneously with intraoperative surgical photography (left side of each pair) and posterior-segment iOCT (right side of each pair). The green and red lines in the photographs indicate axial and sagittal B-scans in the OCT images, respectively. a Case 2. Vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome. The VMT (asterisks) was released, with minimal shadowing (arrowheads) from the 27-gauge instrumentation on the underlying tissues (left image pair). A remnant ERM (arrows) was present, which was removed successfully (left and middle pairs). Finally, no remaining remnant ERM was present (right pair). b Case 3. ERM (lamellar macular hole, MH). An MH was not present before ERM and ILM peeling (left image pair). The ERM (arrow) was carefully peeled with minimal shadowing (arrowheads) from the 27-gauge instrumentation on the underlying tissues (middle pair). Hyperreflective material on the top of the fovea, which appeared as a whitish ring in fundus photography, indicated the presence of triamcinolone particles on the residual ILM, with no post-ERM removal iatrogenic MH (right pair). c Case 4. Macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with vitreous hemorrhage (VH). The VH was removed (left image pair) and the surgeon confirmed that there was no macular detachment (middle pair). RRD repair was performed with confirmation that no macular detachment occurred during fluid-air exchange (FAX) and cryoretinopexy (right pair). d Case 5. Retinal detachment due to MH in a highly myopic eye. An open MH was present before ILM peeling (left image pair). FAX was performed after ILM peeling (middle pair). Subretinal fluid was successfully removed through the MH during and after FAX with minimal shadowing (arrowheads) from the 27-gauge instrumentation on the underlying tissues (right pair). e Case 6. MH after ERM and ILM removal in a highly myopic eye. A relatively large MH was present without an ILM (left image pair). An autologous ILM (arrow) was transplanted from another region with minimal shadowing (arrowheads) from the 27-gauge instrumentation on the underlying tissues (middle pair). Proper placement of the autologous ILM graft in the fovea during and after FAX was confirmed (right pair).