David Andrew Gunn1, Lisbeth Aagaard Larsen2, Jaspal Singh Lall3, Helle Rexbye2, Kaare Christensen2. 1. Unilever Research and Development, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, UK. david.gunn@unilever.com. 2. The Danish Twin Registry and The Danish Aging Research Center, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark. 3. Unilever Research and Development, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether facial or surrounding (eg, hair and clothing) cues have the strongest influence on the perceived age of subjects in photographic images, and which drives links between perceived age and survival. METHODS: In 2001, 187 Danish twin pairs (n = 374) aged 70+ years were photographed generating passport-type images. The faces of the twins in these images were swapped creating two new images per twin pair (748 images in total). Ten nurses rated the perceived age of the twin from the original and swapped facial images. The survival of the twins was determined through to the end of 2013. RESULTS: Changing the face or its surrounding significantly changed the perceived age of the images, with only a marginal difference between their effect sizes (difference of 0.5 years, 95% confidence interval CI -0.1 to 1.1). Perceived age, adjusting for chronological age, and sex, was a predictor of survival up to 7 years (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.25) and also 7-12 years (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12) after the photographs were taken. Where the older looking twin died first they had a significantly older looking face (1.4 years older, 95% CI 0.3-2.6) but not surrounding (0.3 years older, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.4) compared to where the older looking twin died second. CONCLUSIONS: Facial visual cues but not hair or clothing cues drive the link between perceived age and survival.
BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether facial or surrounding (eg, hair and clothing) cues have the strongest influence on the perceived age of subjects in photographic images, and which drives links between perceived age and survival. METHODS: In 2001, 187 Danish twin pairs (n = 374) aged 70+ years were photographed generating passport-type images. The faces of the twins in these images were swapped creating two new images per twin pair (748 images in total). Ten nurses rated the perceived age of the twin from the original and swapped facial images. The survival of the twins was determined through to the end of 2013. RESULTS: Changing the face or its surrounding significantly changed the perceived age of the images, with only a marginal difference between their effect sizes (difference of 0.5 years, 95% confidence interval CI -0.1 to 1.1). Perceived age, adjusting for chronological age, and sex, was a predictor of survival up to 7 years (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.25) and also 7-12 years (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12) after the photographs were taken. Where the older looking twin died first they had a significantly older looking face (1.4 years older, 95% CI 0.3-2.6) but not surrounding (0.3 years older, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.4) compared to where the older looking twin died second. CONCLUSIONS: Facial visual cues but not hair or clothing cues drive the link between perceived age and survival.
Authors: Kaare Christensen; Maria Iachina; Helle Rexbye; Cecilia Tomassini; Henrik Frederiksen; Matt McGue; James W Vaupel Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: David A Gunn; Peter G Murray; Cyrena C Tomlin; Helle Rexbye; Kaare Christensen; Andrew E Mayes Journal: Biogerontology Date: 2008-04-22 Impact factor: 4.277
Authors: David A Gunn; Anton J M de Craen; Joanne L Dick; Cyrena C Tomlin; Diana van Heemst; Sharon D Catt; Tamara Griffiths; Stephanie Ogden; Andrea B Maier; Peter G Murray; Christopher E M Griffiths; P Eline Slagboom; Rudi G J Westendorp Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Dominika Dykiert; Timothy C Bates; Alan J Gow; Lars Penke; John M Starr; Ian J Deary Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Kaare Christensen; Mikael Thinggaard; Matt McGue; Helle Rexbye; Jacob V B Hjelmborg; Abraham Aviv; David Gunn; Frans van der Ouderaa; James W Vaupel Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-12-10
Authors: Francisco R Avila; Ricardo A Torres-Guzman; Karla C Maita; John P Garcia; Clifton R Haider; Olivia A Ho; Rickey E Carter; Christopher J McLeod; Charles J Bruce; Antonio J Forte Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 2.326