Literature DB >> 26265725

Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement.

Sarah Carter.   

Abstract

Concerns that people would be disinclined to voluntarily undergo moral enhancement have led to suggestions that an incentivised programme should be introduced to encourage participation. This paper argues that, while such measures do not necessarily result in coercion or undue inducement (issues with which one may typically associate the use of incentives in general), the use of incentives for this purpose may present a taboo trade-off. This is due to empirical research suggesting that those characteristics likely to be affected by moral enhancement are often perceived as fundamental to the self; therefore, any attempt to put a price on such traits would likely be deemed morally unacceptable by those who hold this view. A better approach to address the possible lack of participation may be to instead invest in alternative marketing strategies and remove incentives altogether. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behaviour Modification; Enhancement; Moral Psychology; Neuroethics; Public Policy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26265725     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  A Kantian ethics approach to moral bioenhancement.

Authors:  Sarah Carter
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated?

Authors:  Sarah Carter
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2017-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.