Literature DB >> 26265600

Arsenic and fluoride contaminated groundwaters: A review of current technologies for contaminants removal.

Sachin V Jadhav1, Eugenio Bringas2, Ganapati D Yadav3, Virendra K Rathod1, Inmaculada Ortiz2, Kumudini V Marathe1.   

Abstract

Chronic contamination of groundwaters by both arsenic (As) and fluoride (F) is frequently observed around the world, which has severely affected millions of people. Fluoride and As are introduced into groundwaters by several sources such as water-rock interactions, anthropogenic activities, and groundwater recharge. Coexistence of these pollutants can have adverse effects due to synergistic and/or antagonistic mechanisms leading to uncertain and complicated health effects, including cancer. Many developing countries are beset with the problem of F and As laden waters, with no affordable technologies to provide clean water supply. The technologies available for the simultaneous removal are akin to chemical treatment, adsorption and membrane processes. However, the presence of competing ions such as phosphate, silicate, nitrate, chloride, carbonate, and sulfate affect the removal efficiency. Highly efficient, low-cost and sustainable technology which could be used by rural populations is of utmost importance for simultaneous removal of both pollutants. This can be realized by using readily available low cost materials coupled with proper disposal units. Synthesis of inexpensive and highly selective nanoadsorbents or nanofunctionalized membranes is required along with encapsulation units to isolate the toxicant loaded materials to avoid their re-entry in aquifers. A vast number of reviews have been published periodically on removal of As or F alone. However, there is a dearth of literature on the simultaneous removal of both. This review critically analyzes this important issue and considers strategies for their removal and safe disposal.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Arsenic; Electrocoagulation; Fluoride; Ion exchange, Contaminant removal; Membrane

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26265600     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  25 in total

1.  Arsenic sorption by red mud-modified biochar produced from rice straw.

Authors:  Chuan Wu; Liu Huang; Sheng-Guo Xue; Yu-Ying Huang; William Hartley; Meng-Qian Cui; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Adsorption of As(III) versus As(V) from aqueous solutions by cerium-loaded volcanic rocks.

Authors:  Tsegaye Girma Asere; Kim Verbeken; Dejene A Tessema; Fekadu Fufa; Christian V Stevens; Gijs Du Laing
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Protective Effects of Baicalin on Arsenic Trioxide-induced Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  DA-Tian Bau; Chung-Lin Tsai; Chia-Wen Tsai; Wen-Shin Chang; Jiunn-Cherng Lin; Te-Chun Hsia
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Reducing arsenic and groundwater contaminants down to safe level for drinking purposes via Fe3+-attached hybrid column.

Authors:  Fatma Gurbuz; Şahin Akpınar; Samet Ozcan; Ömür Acet; Mehmet Odabaşı
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Defluoridation of water using autochthonous bacterial isolates.

Authors:  Sonika Sharma; Dhwani Upadhyay; Bhupendra Singh; Divya Shrivastava; Niha Mohan Kulshreshtha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Chemical and genetic control of IFNγ-induced MHCII expression.

Authors:  Ruud H Wijdeven; Marvin M van Luijn; Annet F Wierenga-Wolf; Jimmy J Akkermans; Peter J van den Elsen; Rogier Q Hintzen; Jacques Neefjes
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Assessment of arsenic removal efficiency by an iron oxide-coated sand filter process.

Authors:  Arianna Callegari; Navarro Ferronato; Elena Cristina Rada; Andrea G Capodaglio; Vincenzo Torretta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Adsorptive removal of fluoride from water by granular zirconium-aluminum hybrid adsorbent: performance and mechanisms.

Authors:  Kun Wu; Yuanyuan Chen; Yongqiang Ouyang; Hang Lei; Ting Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Evaluation of epigenetic alterations (mir-126 and mir-155 expression levels) in Mexican children exposed to inorganic arsenic via drinking water.

Authors:  Mónica S Pérez-Vázquez; Ángeles C Ochoa-Martínez; Tania RuÍz-Vera; Yesenia Araiza-Gamboa; Iván N Pérez-Maldonado
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Fluoride levels in supply water from a volcanic area in the Macaronesia region.

Authors:  Carmen Rubio; Inmaculada Rodríguez; Juan R Jaudenes; Angel J Gutiérrez; Soraya Paz; Antonio Burgos; Arturo Hardisson; Consuelo Revert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.