Literature DB >> 26265539

Proliferation-coupled osteoclast differentiation by RANKL: Cell density as a determinant of osteoclast formation.

M Motiur Rahman1, Sunao Takeshita2, Kazuhiko Matsuoka1, Keiko Kaneko1, Yoshinori Naoe1, Asako Sakaue-Sawano3, Atsushi Miyawaki3, Kyoji Ikeda4.   

Abstract

Although it is widely recognized that the osteoclast differentiation induced by RANKL is linked to the anti-proliferative activity of the cytokine, we report here that RANKL in the presence of M-CSF actually stimulates DNA synthesis and cell proliferation during the early proliferative phase (0-48 h) of osteoclastogenesis ex vivo, while the same cytokine exerts an anti-proliferative activity in the latter half (48-96 h). A tracing of the individual cells using Fucci cell cycle indicators showed that waves of active DNA synthesis in the S phase during the period 0-48 h are followed by cell-cycle arrest and cell fusion after 48 h. Inhibition of DNA synthesis with hydroxyurea (HU) during the first half almost completely inhibited osteoclastogenesis; however, the same HU-treated cells, when re-plated at 48 h at increasing cell densities, exhibited restored osteoclast formation, suggesting that a sufficient number of cells, rather than prior DNA synthesis, is the most critical requirement for osteoclast formation. In addition, varying either the number of bone marrow macrophages at the start of osteoclastogenic cultures or pre-osteoclasts halfway through the process had a substantial impact on the number of osteoclasts that finally formed, as well as the timing of the peak of osteoclast formation. Thus, caution should be exerted in the performance of any manipulative procedure, whether pharmacological or genetic, that affects the cell number prior to cell fusion. Such procedures can have a profound effect on the number of osteoclasts that form, the final outcome of "differentiation", leading to misinterpretation of the results.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell cycle; Cell density; DNA synthesis; Differentiation; Osteoclast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26265539     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  13 in total

Review 1.  The role of osteoclast differentiation and function in skeletal homeostasis.

Authors:  Kyoji Ikeda; Sunao Takeshita
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Methods for Analyzing the Impacts of Natural Uranium on In Vitro Osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Tatiana Gritsaenko; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Gaëlle Creff; Claude Vidaud; Georges Carle; Sabine Santucci-Darmanin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Identification of Novel Genes for Cell Fusion during Osteoclast Formation.

Authors:  Eunjin Cho; Seongmin Cheon; Mina Ding; Kayeong Lim; Sang-Wook Park; Chungoo Park; Tae-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  p38α MAPK regulates proliferation and differentiation of osteoclast progenitors and bone remodeling in an aging-dependent manner.

Authors:  Qian Cong; Hao Jia; Ping Li; Shoutao Qiu; James Yeh; Yibin Wang; Zhen-Lin Zhang; Junping Ao; Baojie Li; Huijuan Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Inhibition of CCL3 abrogated precursor cell fusion and bone erosions in human osteoclast cultures and murine collagen-induced arthritis.

Authors:  Lauren A Jordan; Malin C Erlandsson; Benjamin F Fenner; Ruth Davies; Ann K Harvey; Ernest H Choy; Rachel Errington; Maria I Bokarewa; Anwen S Williams
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Neuropeptide B and neuropeptide W as new serum predictors of nutritional status and of clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with the use of pens or insulin pumps.

Authors:  Teresa Grzelak; Anna Wedrychowicz; Joanna Grupinska; Marta Pelczynska; Marcelina Sperling; Aniceta A Mikulska; Violetta Naughton; Krystyna Czyzewska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Hypoxia negatively affects senescence in osteoclasts and delays osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Ben Gorissen; Alain de Bruin; Alberto Miranda-Bedate; Nicoline Korthagen; Claudia Wolschrijn; Teun J de Vries; René van Weeren; Marianna A Tryfonidou
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Evidence for excessive osteoclast activation in SIRT6 null mice.

Authors:  Demao Zhang; Junjun Jing; Feng Lou; Ruimin Li; Yilin Ping; Fanyuan Yu; Fanzi Wu; Xiao Yang; Ruoshi Xu; Feifei Li; Ke Wang; Mingru Bai; Caixia Pi; Jing Xie; Liwei Zheng; Ling Ye; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  PSTP-3,5-Me Inhibits Osteoclast Differentiation and Bone Resorption.

Authors:  Eunjin Cho; Zhihao Chen; Jinkyung Lee; Sunwoo Lee; Tae-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Heterogeneity and Actin Cytoskeleton in Osteoclast and Macrophage Multinucleation.

Authors:  Jiro Takito; Masanori Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.