Nora Pashayan1, Selena Gray2, Celia Duff3, Julie Parkes4, David Williams5, Fiona Patterson6, Anna Koczwara7, Grant Fisher5, Brendan W Mason8. 1. Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK. 2. University of the West of England, Bristol, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK. 3. Public Health East of England, Cambridge CB21 5XB, UK. 4. Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. 5. Faculty of Public Health, London NW1 4LB, UK. 6. Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK. 7. Work Psychology Group, Derby DE24 8HR, UK. 8. Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC), Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 3NW, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recruitment process for public health specialty training includes an assessment centre (AC) with three components, Rust Advanced Numerical Reasoning Appraisal (RANRA), Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCT) and a Situation Judgement Test (SJT), which determines invitation to a selection centre (SC). The scores are combined into a total recruitment (TR) score that determines the offers of appointment. METHODS: A prospective cohort study using anonymous record linkage to investigate the association between applicant's scores in the recruitment process and registrar's progress through training measured by results of Membership Faculty Public Health (MFPH) examinations and outcomes of the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP). RESULTS: Higher scores in RANRA, WGCT, AC, SC and TR were all significantly associated with higher adjusted odds of passing Part A MFPH exam at the first attempt. Higher scores in AC, SC and TR were significantly associated with passing Part B exam at the first attempt. Higher scores in SJT, AC and SC were significantly associated with satisfactory ARCP outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The current UK national recruitment and selection process for public health specialty training has good predictive validity. The individual components of the process are testing different skills and abilities and together they are providing additive value.
BACKGROUND: The recruitment process for public health specialty training includes an assessment centre (AC) with three components, Rust Advanced Numerical Reasoning Appraisal (RANRA), Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCT) and a Situation Judgement Test (SJT), which determines invitation to a selection centre (SC). The scores are combined into a total recruitment (TR) score that determines the offers of appointment. METHODS: A prospective cohort study using anonymous record linkage to investigate the association between applicant's scores in the recruitment process and registrar's progress through training measured by results of Membership Faculty Public Health (MFPH) examinations and outcomes of the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP). RESULTS: Higher scores in RANRA, WGCT, AC, SC and TR were all significantly associated with higher adjusted odds of passing Part A MFPH exam at the first attempt. Higher scores in AC, SC and TR were significantly associated with passing Part B exam at the first attempt. Higher scores in SJT, AC and SC were significantly associated with satisfactory ARCP outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The current UK national recruitment and selection process for public health specialty training has good predictive validity. The individual components of the process are testing different skills and abilities and together they are providing additive value.