Literature DB >> 26265460

Hydraulic Conductivity of Smooth Muscle Cell-Initiated Arterial Cocultures.

Rishi A Mathura1, Sparkle Russell-Puleri1, Limary M Cancel1, John M Tarbell2.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of arterial coculture conditions on the transport properties of several in vitro endothelial cell (EC)-smooth muscle cell (SMC)-porous filter constructs in which SMC were grown to confluence first and then EC were inoculated. This order of culturing simulates the environment of a blood vessel wall after endothelial layer damage due to stenting, vascular grafting or other vascular wall insult. For all coculture configurations examined, we observed that hydraulic conductivity (L(p)) values were significantly higher than predicted by a resistances-in-series (RIS) model accounting for the L(p) of EC and SMC measured separately. The greatest increases were observed when EC were plated directly on top of a confluent SMC layer without an intervening filter, presumably mediated by direct EC-SMC contacts that were observed under confocal microscopy. The results are the opposite of a previous study that showed L(p) was significantly reduced compared to an RIS model when EC were grown to confluency first. The physiological, pathophysiological and tissue engineering implications of these results are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coculture; Endothelial cells; Hydraulic conductivity; Porous membrane; Smooth muscle cells

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26265460      PMCID: PMC4752435          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1421-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  35 in total

1.  How do kinins affect vascular tone?

Authors:  U S Ryan; J W Ryan; C Whitaker
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Co-culture of endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells affects gene expression of angiogenic factors.

Authors:  Sepideh Heydarkhan-Hagvall; Gisela Helenius; Bengt R Johansson; Julie Y Li; Erney Mattsson; Bo Risberg
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  Vascular smooth muscle cell glycocalyx influences shear stress-mediated contractile response.

Authors:  Kristy M Ainslie; Jeffrey S Garanich; Randal O Dull; John M Tarbell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-08-20

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel growth.

Authors:  E M Conway; D Collen; P Carmeliet
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2001-02-16       Impact factor: 10.787

5.  Shear-induced increase in hydraulic conductivity in endothelial cells is mediated by a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Y S Chang; J A Yaccino; S Lakshminarayanan; J A Frangos; J M Tarbell
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  In vitro study of LDL transport under pressurized (convective) conditions.

Authors:  Limary M Cancel; Andrew Fitting; John M Tarbell
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  A system for the direct co-culture of endothelium on smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Mark D Lavender; Zhengyu Pang; Charles S Wallace; Laura E Niklason; George A Truskey
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  The fabrication of double layer tubular vascular tissue engineering scaffold via coaxial electrospinning and its 3D cell coculture.

Authors:  Lin Ye; Jie Cao; Lamei Chen; Xue Geng; Ai-Ying Zhang; Lian-Rui Guo; Yong-Quan Gu; Zeng-Guo Feng
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Complimentary endothelial cell/smooth muscle cell co-culture systems with alternate smooth muscle cell phenotypes.

Authors:  Stacey L Rose; Julia E Babensee
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  The myoendothelial junction: breaking through the matrix?

Authors:  Katherine R Heberlein; Adam C Straub; Brant E Isakson
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.