Literature DB >> 26265160

Cancer patients' preferences of care within hospitals: a systematic literature review.

Gitte Stentebjerg Petersen1, Janne Lehmann Knudsen1, Mette Marianne Vinter1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Knowledge about cancer patients' preferences in health care is important because it enables care to be patient centered. However, the literature does not provide an overview. The aim of this study was to identify the dimensions of hospital-based cancer care that patients evaluate the most important using Patient-rated importance as a method. DATA SOURCE: PubMed was searched in 2013/2014. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified, if they were in accordance with specific search terms and focused on hospital-based cancer care. Totally, 11 studies were found. DATA EXTRACTION: The 11 studies comprised a total of 598 items. Of these, 592 items were categorized into 19 care dimensions. The highest rated quartile of items was identified as care elements patients evaluated to be the most important. Identification of the most important dimensions was done by calculating the percentages of items within each dimension that were within the highest quartile. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: The 11 studies varied a lot in regard to aim and patient characteristics. The three most important dimensions were as follows: Rapid diagnosis and treatment; High professional standard; and Information about treatment and side(effects)/consequences. Within four dimensions, Psychosocial support, Physical facilities, Waiting time and Transparency in care, no items were within the highest quartile.
CONCLUSION: Patient-rated importance was a useful method in identifying the care patients preferred. Due to a limited number of studies and great diversity within studies evaluated, interpretation of results should be cautious. However, it seems that cancer patients treated in hospitals with a curative intent find treatment-related information, professional standard and short delay of diagnosis and treatment most important.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; hospital care; patient preferences; patient-centered care; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26265160     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  11 in total

1.  Operationalizing patient-centered cancer care: A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature on cancer patients' needs, values, and preferences.

Authors:  Kerri-Anne R Mitchell; Kelly J Brassil; Serena A Rodriguez; Edward Tsai; Kayo Fujimoto; Kate J Krause; L Aubree Shay; Andrew E Springer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Understanding racial-ethnic differences in patient-centered care (PCC) in oncology through a critical race theory lens: A qualitative comparison of PCC among Black, Hispanic, and White cancer patients.

Authors:  Kerri-Anne R Mitchell; Kelly J Brassil; Margaret L Osborne; Qian Lu; Richard F Brown
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-11-19

3.  From early detection to rehabilitation in the community: reading beyond the blog testimonies of survivors' quality of life and prostate cancer representation.

Authors:  Margareth Santos Zanchetta; Marguerite Cognet; Mary Rachel Lam-Kin-Teng; Marie Elisabeth Dumitriu; Lise Renaud; Jacques Rhéaume
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Satisfaction of breast cancer patients regarding surgery and radiation therapy: A survey in Japan.

Authors:  Anneyuko I Saito; Masaru Suda; Keisuke Sasai; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-09-15

5.  Impact of socioeconomic status on patient experience on quality of care for ambulatory healthcare services in tertiary hospitals in Southeast Nigeria.

Authors:  Henry E Aloh; Obinna E Onwujekwe; Obianuju G Aloh; Ijeoma L Okoronkwo; Chijioke Joel Nweke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Patient preferences for whole-body MRI or conventional staging pathways in lung and colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Stuart A Taylor; Ruth E C Evans; Steve Halligan; Sandy Beare; John Bridgewater; Vicky Goh; Sam Janes; Neil Navani; Alf Oliver; Alison Morton; Andrea Rockall; Caroline S Clarke; Stephen Morris
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Improving Nurses’ Hand-off Process on Oncology Setting Using Lean Management Principles

Authors:  Omar Ayaad; Anas Haroun; Rawya Yaseen; Fouad Thiab; Khalid Al-Rawashdeh; Iqbal Mohammad; Mohammad Aqtash; Saleh Qadumi; Yazan Altantawi; Ahmad Nairat
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-05-25

8.  The acceptance and applicability of a patient-reported experience measurement tool in oncological care: a descriptive feasibility study in northern Germany.

Authors:  Christiane Rudolph; Gitte Stentebjerg Petersen; Ron Pritzkuleit; Hans Storm; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Model of delivery of cancer care in South Africa's Eastern Cape and Mpumalanga provinces: a situational analysis protocol.

Authors:  Wezile Chitha; Buyiswa Swartbooi; Zukiswa Jafta; Itumeleng Funani; Kedibone Maake; Danleen Hongoro; Lizo Godlimpi; Onke R Mnyaka; Natasha Williams; Lazola Buthi; Sibulelo Kuseni; Christopher Zungu; Siyabonga Sibulawa; Awam Mavimbela; Olona Giwu; Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda; Vivien Essel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Predictors of patient preference for either whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) or CT/ PET-CT for staging colorectal or lung cancer.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Ruth Ec Evans; Steve Halligan; Sandy Beare; John Bridgewater; Vicky Goh; Sam M Janes; Neal Navani; Alfred Oliver; Alison Morton; Steve Morris; Andrea Rockall; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.